The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Soft x-ray reduction lithography using multilayer mirrors
Abstract
A soft x-ray lithograpy using multilayer mirrors for demagnifying optics and a reflecting mask has been designed and studied experimentally. In this system, a wavelength of 45–130 Å has been selected based on the optical characteristics, the exposed depth of the resist film, and the reflectivity of the multilayer mirror. To obtain a replication pattern resolution of 0.2 μm, the numerical aperture required is estimated to be greater than 0.0125 or 0.0325 for a wavelength of 50 or 130 Å, respectively. These values show that the multilayer optics using two mirrors can be realized to replicate a 0.2 μm pattern. The experiments were performed on the SR beamline BL-1 of the KEK-PF storage ring. The Schwarzschild demagnifying optics with a ring field were designed and fabricated. Demagnified exposure patterns of less than 0.5 μm have been obtained using a reflecting mask. The feasibility of the soft x-ray reduction method using multilayer mirrors has been confirmed. Furthermore, new telecentric optics are proposed to realize a practical reduction lithography system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pushing the limits of lithography
Ito, T., & Okazaki, S. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35023233 · Cited by 901
X-Rays and Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation
Attwood, D. T., & Sakdinawat, A. E. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107477629 · Cited by 758
Extreme ultraviolet lithography: A review
Wu, B., & Kumar, A. (2007) · Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena · doi:10.1116/1.2794048 · Cited by 402
Study of The Spatial and Temporal Coherence of High-Order Harmonics
Salieres, P. L., L’Huillier, A., Antoine, P., & Lewenstein, M. (1999) · Advances in atomic, molecular, and optical physics · doi:10.1016/s1049-250x(08)60219-0 · Cited by 328
Extreme ultraviolet lithography
Gwyn, C. W., Stulen, R. H., Sweeney, D. W., & Attwood, D. T. (1998) · Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena · doi:10.1116/1.590453 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Kinoshita, H., Kurihara, K., Ishii, Y., & Torii, Y.
- Affiliations
- NTT (Japan) (JP)
- ORCID
- Kurihara, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics Processing and Phenomena
- Publisher
- American Vacuum Society
- Published
- 1989-11-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1648-1651
- ISSN
- 0734-211X (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9877
- OpenAlex
- W1999734163
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics Processing and Phenomena (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
- Keywords
- soft X-ray lithography, multilayer mirrors, telecentric optics, numerical aperture, pattern resolution, synchrotron radiation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review