The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature combination strategies for saliency-based visual attention systems
Open accessAbstract
Bottom-up or saliency-based visual attention allows primates to detect nonspecific conspicuous targets in cluttered scenes. A classical metaphor, derived from electrophysiological and psychophysical studies, describes attention as a rapidly shiftable ‘‘spotlight.’’ We use a model that reproduces the attentional scan paths of this spotlight. Simple multi-scale ‘‘feature maps’’ detect local spatial discontinuities in intensity, color, and orientation, and are combined into a unique ‘‘master’’ or ‘‘saliency’’ map. The saliency map is sequentially scanned, in order of decreasing saliency, by the focus of attention. We here study the problem of combining feature maps, from different visual modalities (such as color and orientation), into a unique saliency map. Four combination strategies are compared using three databases of natural color images: (1) Simple normalized summation, (2) linear combination with learned weights, (3) global nonlinear normalization followed by summation, and (4) local nonlinear competition between salient locations followed by summation. Performance was measured as the number of false detections before the most salient target was found. Strategy (1) always yielded poorest performance and (2) best performance, with a threefold to eightfold improvement in time to find a salient target. However, (2) yielded specialized systems with poor generalization. Interestingly, strategy (4) and its simplified, computationally efficient approximation (3) yielded significantly better performance than (1), with up to fourfold improvement, while preserving generality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex
Heeger, D. J. (1992) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523800009640 · Cited by 1,835
Olshausen, B., Anderson, C., & Van Essen, D. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-11-04700.1993 · Cited by 908
Cited by
Computational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
Self-citationAn Integrated Model of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention for Optimizing Detection Speed
Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.54 · Cited by 369
Self-citationSearch Goal Tunes Visual Features Optimally
Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.018 · Cited by 331
Self-citationWhite, B. J., Berg, D. J., Kan, J. Y., Marino, R. A., Itti, L., & Munoz, D. P. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14263 · Cited by 191
Self-citationPerformance of visually guided tasks using simulated prosthetic vision and saliency-based cues
Parikh, N., Itti, L., Humayun, M., & Weiland, J. (2013) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/10/2/026017 · Cited by 54
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Itti, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Electronic Imaging
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161
- ISSN
- 1017-9909 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170161511
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feature combination strategies for saliency-based visual attention systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/1.1333677
- The paper
- Itti, L. (2001). Feature combination strategies for saliency-based visual attention systems. Journal of Electronic Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1333677
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.