Cited by 311Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

Autofluorescence removal, multiplexing, and automated analysis methods for in-vivo fluorescence imaging

Open access
Mansfield, James R., Gossage, Kirk W., Hoyt, Clifford C., Levenson, Richard M.·2005·Journal of Biomedical Optics

Abstract

The ability to image and quantitate fluorescently labeled markers in vivo has generally been limited by autofluorescence of the tissue. Skin, in particular, has a strong autofluorescence signal, particularly when excited in the blue or green wavelengths. Fluorescence labels with emission wavelengths in the near-infrared are more amenable to deep-tissue imaging, because both scattering and autofluorescence are reduced as wavelengths are increased, but even in these spectral regions, autofluorescence can still limit sensitivity. Multispectral imaging (MSI), however, can remove the signal degradation caused by autofluorescence while adding enhanced multiplexing capabilities. While the availability of spectral "libraries" makes multispectral analysis routine for well-characterized samples, new software tools have been developed that greatly simplify the application of MSI to novel specimens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/1.2032458

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lung can be driven into pathological conditions by external stimuli including smoke exposure and viral infections.

    “The lung can be driven into pathological conditions by a variety of external stimuli, including smoke exposure64 and viral infections65,71.”

    From Guidelines for minimal information on cellular senescence experimentation in vivo (2024) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Introduction discusses fluorescence imaging, and Methodology discusses imaging mice; neither addresses lung pathology. Searches for smoke exposure and viral infection found no passage linking either to pathological lung conditions. In the citing sentence, this source appears to be cited for viral infections, but our copy does not address that point. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. G. Bearman and R. Levenson, in Biomedical Photonics Handbook, T. Vo-Dinh, Ed., pp. 8_1-8_26, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL ͑2003͒.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mansfield, J. R., Gossage, K. W., Hoyt, C. C., & Levenson, R. M.
Affiliations
  • CRI Inc.
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Cambridge Research and Instrumentation, Inc.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Optics
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
10
Issue
04
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 1083-3668 (ISSN-L)
  • 1560-2281
OpenAlex
W1988987966
Cited by
311
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
FWCI
16.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Optics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Emory University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Keywords
multispectral imaging, in vivo fluorescence imaging, skin autofluorescence, near-infrared fluorescence, deep tissue imaging, spectral library, automated image analysis, tissue scattering
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Luminescent Proteins, Male, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Neoplasm Proteins, Prostatic Neoplasms, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Phantoms, Imaging, Quantum Dots, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review