The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tissue polarimetry: concepts, challenges, applications, and outlook
Open accessAbstract
Polarimetry has a long and successful history in various forms of clear media. Driven by their biomedical potential, the use of the polarimetric approaches for biological tissue assessment has also recently received considerable attention. Specifically, polarization can be used as an effective tool to discriminate against multiply scattered light (acting as a gating mechanism) in order to enhance contrast and to improve tissue imaging resolution. Moreover, the intrinsic tissue polarimetry characteristics contain a wealth of morphological and functional information of potential biomedical importance. However, in a complex random medium-like tissue, numerous complexities due to multiple scattering and simultaneous occurrences of many scattering and polarization events present formidable challenges both in terms of accurate measurements and in terms of analysis of the tissue polarimetry signal. In order to realize the potential of the polarimetric approaches for tissue imaging and characterization/diagnosis, a number of researchers are thus pursuing innovative solutions to these challenges. In this review paper, we summarize these and other issues pertinent to the polarized light methodologies in tissues. Specifically, we discuss polarized light basics, Stokes-Muller formalism, methods of polarization measurements, polarized light modeling in turbid media, applications to tissue imaging, inverse analysis for polarimetric results quantification, applications to quantitative tissue assessment, etc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition
Lu, S.-Y., & Chipman, R. A. (1996) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.13.001106 · Cited by 1,409
Imaging skin pathology with polarized light
Jacques, S. L., Ramella-Roman, J. C., & Lee, K. (2002) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/1.1484498 · Cited by 582
Morgan, S. P., Khong, M. P., & Somekh, M. G. (1997) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.36.001560 · Cited by 136
Cited by
Polarized light interaction with tissues
Tuchin, V. V. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.21.7.071114 · Cited by 384
Mueller polarimetric imaging for surgical and diagnostic applications: a review
Qi, J., & Elson, D. S. (2017) · Journal of Biophotonics · doi:10.1002/jbio.201600152 · Cited by 268
Kunnen, B., Macdonald, C., Doronin, A., Jacques, S., Eccles, M., & Meglinski, I. (2015) · Journal of Biophotonics · doi:10.1002/jbio.201400104 · Cited by 261
Differentiation of suspended particles by polarized light scattering at 120°
Wang, Y., Liao, R., Dai, J., Liu, Z., Xiong, Z., Zhang, T., Chen, H., & Ma, H. (2018) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.26.022419 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghosh, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Optics
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2011-11-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 110801
- ISSN
- 1083-3668 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011086418
- Cited by
- 740
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tissue polarimetry: concepts, challenges, applications, and outlook. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/1.3652896
- The paper
- Ghosh, N. (2011). Tissue polarimetry: concepts, challenges, applications, and outlook. Journal of Biomedical Optics. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3652896
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.