Cited by 10Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAnatomy and Medical TechnologyMedical Imaging and Analysis

Schaltenbrand-Wahren-Talairach-Tournoux brain atlas registration:

Nowinski, Wieslaw L., Fang, Anthony, Nguyen, Bonnie T.·1995·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

The CIeMed electronic brain atlas system contains electronic versions of multiple paper brain atlases with 3D extensions; some other 3D brain atlases are under development. Its primary goal is to provide automatic labeling and quantification of brains. The atlas data are digitized, enhanced, color coded, labeled, and organized into volumes. The atlas system provides several tools for registration, 3D display and real-time manipulation, object extraction/editing, quantification, image processing and analysis, reformatting, anatomical index operations, and file handling. The two main stereotactic atlases provided by the system are electronic and enhanced versions of Atlas of Stereotaxy of the Human Brain by Schaltenbrand and Wahren and Co-Planar Stereotactic Atlas of the Human Brain by Talairach and Tournoux. Each of these atlases has its own strengths and their combination has several advantages. First, a complementary information is merged and provided to the user. Second, the user can register data with a single atlas only, as the Schaltenbrand-Wahren-Talairach-Tournoux registration is data-independent. And last but not least, a direct registration of the Schaltenbrand-Wahren microseries with MRI data may not be feasible, since cerebral deep structures are usually not clearly discernible on MRI images. This paper addresses registration of the Schaltenbrand- Wahren and Talairach-Tournoux brain atlases. A modified proportional grid system transformation is introduced and suitable sets of landmarks identifiable in both atlases are defined. The accuracy of registration is discussed. A continuous navigation in the multi- atlas/patient data space is presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.207607

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Historically, most targets discussed were identified pre-surgically in standard stereotactic anatomical space based on atlases.

    “Historically, most targets discussed here have been identified pre-surgically in standard stereotactic anatomical space based on atlases [11,87].”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [87]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nowinski, W. L., Fang, A., & Nguyen, B. T.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
1995-04-27
Volume
2431
Pages
126-136
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969006801
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.20
Type
conference paper
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
brain atlas registration, landmark-based registration, brain MRI registration, brain labeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review