Printing 130-nm DRAM isolation pattern: Zernike correlation and tool improvement
Abstract
To meet lithographic requirements for the 130nm generation, the influence of aberrations on printing of various patterns is investigated. This paper shows a process for patterns that are sensitive to coma and three wave. The aberration sensitivities are calculated and the effect on printing experimentally verified. This analysis leads to slight changes in lens adjustment strategy to accommodate the printing of specific DRAM patterns. Additional improvements in materials and surface figures, as well as reduction in process-induced aberrations and associated RMS wave front error, enable the production of tools that are capable of printing the 130nm device generation. The importance of collaboration between makers of lithography tools and their customers cannot be underestimated in finding tool specific limitations. Because of the length of the design cycle of lithography tools it is necessary to perform analysis of device patterns years in advance. The current work also indicates that patterns historically used to determine lens specifications, such as dense and isolated lines, are insufficient to fully determine lens specifications. This paper also outlines techniques that can be used to reduce aberration sensitivities by use of resolution enhancement techniques. This is another area where close interaction between vendor and customer is needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extreme ultraviolet lithography
Kazazis, D., Santaclara, J. G., van Schoot, J., Mochi, I., & Ekinci, Y. (2024) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-024-00361-z · Cited by 149 · see citing works
“Aberrations can have a detrimental impact on the aerial image, contrast and focus, leading to overlay and asymmetry errors 31 .”
Self-citationRubingh, R., van Dommelen, Y., Tempelaars, S., et al. (2003) · Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and Metrology · doi:10.1117/1.1531190 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationImage-based EUVL aberration metrology
Fenger, G. L. (2013) · RIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Zhang, F., & Li, Y. (2006) · IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems · doi:10.1109/nems.2006.334613
“By introducing a fixed amount of aberration for each Zernike coefficient with all other aberrations being zero [7], the image quality and CD uniformity are calculated under different flare and polarized light conditions.”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- van Schoot, J. B., Seong, N., Geh, B., Burkhardt, M., Graeupner, P., Reisinger, G., Rubingh, R., Suddendorf, M., Finders, J., & Rikkers, E.
- Affiliations
- Samsung (United States) (US)
- Carl Zeiss (United States) (US)
- ASML (United States) (US)
- Carl Zeiss (Germany) (DE)
- ASML (Netherlands) (NL)
- ORCID
- Burkhardt, Martin
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2001-09-14
- Volume
- 4346
- Pages
- 229
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007625801
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced optical system design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Optical measurement and interference techniques
- Keywords
- coma aberration, lens specifications, wavefront error, resolution enhancement techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review