Cited by 4Advancements in Photolithography TechniquesAdvanced optical system designOptical measurement and interference techniques

Printing 130-nm DRAM isolation pattern: Zernike correlation and tool improvement

van Schoot, Jan B., Seong, Nakgeuon, Geh, Bernd, Burkhardt, Martin, Graeupner, Paul, Reisinger, Gerd, Rubingh, Rian, Suddendorf, Manfred +2 more·2001·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

To meet lithographic requirements for the 130nm generation, the influence of aberrations on printing of various patterns is investigated. This paper shows a process for patterns that are sensitive to coma and three wave. The aberration sensitivities are calculated and the effect on printing experimentally verified. This analysis leads to slight changes in lens adjustment strategy to accommodate the printing of specific DRAM patterns. Additional improvements in materials and surface figures, as well as reduction in process-induced aberrations and associated RMS wave front error, enable the production of tools that are capable of printing the 130nm device generation. The importance of collaboration between makers of lithography tools and their customers cannot be underestimated in finding tool specific limitations. Because of the length of the design cycle of lithography tools it is necessary to perform analysis of device patterns years in advance. The current work also indicates that patterns historically used to determine lens specifications, such as dense and isolated lines, are insufficient to fully determine lens specifications. This paper also outlines techniques that can be used to reduce aberration sensitivities by use of resolution enhancement techniques. This is another area where close interaction between vendor and customer is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.435723

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Schoot, J. B., Seong, N., Geh, B., Burkhardt, M., Graeupner, P., Reisinger, G., Rubingh, R., Suddendorf, M., Finders, J., & Rikkers, E.
Affiliations
  • Samsung (United States) (US)
  • Carl Zeiss (United States) (US)
  • ASML (United States) (US)
  • Carl Zeiss (Germany) (DE)
  • ASML (Netherlands) (NL)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2001-09-14
Volume
4346
Pages
229
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007625801
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced optical system design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Optical measurement and interference techniques
Keywords
coma aberration, lens specifications, wavefront error, resolution enhancement techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review