Cited by 42Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Glimpses of the past activity of Sgr A★ inferred from X-ray echoes in Sgr C

Open access
Chuard, D., Terrier, R., Goldwurm, A., Clavel, M., Soldi, S., Morris, M. R., Ponti, G., Walls, M. +1 more·2018·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

Context. For a decade now, evidence has accumulated that giant molecular clouds located within the central molecular zone of our Galaxy reflect X-rays coming from past outbursts of the Galactic supermassive black hole. However, the number of illuminating events as well as their ages and durations are still unresolved questions. Aims. We aim to reconstruct parts of the history of the supermassive black hole Sgr A★ by studying this reflection phenomenon in the molecular complex Sgr C and by determining the line-of-sight positions of its main bright substructures. Methods. Using observations made with the X-ray observatories XMM-Newton and Chandra and between 2000 and 2014, we investigated the variability of the reflected emission, which consists of a Fe K α line at 6.4 keV and a Compton continuum. We carried out an imaging and a spectral analysis. We also used a Monte Carlo model of the reflected spectra to constrain the line-of-sight positions of the brightest clumps, and hence to assign an approximate date to the associated illuminating events. Results. We show that the Fe K α emission from Sgr C exhibits significant variability in both space and time, which confirms its reflection origin. The most likely illuminating source is Sgr A★. On the one hand, we report two distinct variability timescales, as one clump undergoes a sudden rise and fall in about 2005, while two others vary smoothly throughout the whole 2000–2014 period. On the other hand, by fitting the Monte Carlo model to the data, we are able to place tight constraints on the 3D positions of the clumps. These two independent approaches provide a consistent picture of the past activity of Sgr A★, since the two slowly varying clumps are located on the same wavefront, while the third (rapidly varying) clump corresponds to a different wavefront, that is, to a different illuminating event. Conclusions. This work shows that Sgr A★ experienced at least two powerful outbursts in the past 300 yrs, and for the first time, we provide an estimation of their age. Extending this approach to other molecular complexes, such as Sgr A, will allow this two-event scenario to be tested further.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201731864

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Detailed modeling of the X-ray line intensity variation across molecular clouds suggests there could have been two events in the last ~300 yr, one at ~240 yr ago, lasting for ~10 yr and another at ~100 yr ago, lasting for a few yr.

    “Detailed modeling of the X-ray line intensity variation across molecular clouds suggests that there could have been two events in the last ∼ 300 yr, one at ∼ 240 yr ago, lasting for ∼ 10 yr and another at ∼ 100 yr ago, lasting for a few yr (Clavel et al. 2013; Churazov et al. 2017; Chuard et al. 2018; Marin et al. 2023).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Chuard et al. 2018

  • Variation of Fe Kα line intensity across the clouds as well as during repeated observations indicate that Sgr A* is variable on a ~(1-10) yr time-scale.

    “Variation of Fe K α line intensity across the clouds as well as during repeated observations indicate that Sgr A ∗ is variable on a ∼ (1 -10) yr time-scale (Muno et al. 2007; Chuard et al. 2018).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Chuard et al. 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chuard, D., Terrier, R., Goldwurm, A., Clavel, M., Soldi, S., Morris, M. R., Ponti, G., Walls, M., & Chernyakova, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Space Sciences Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE)
  • Dublin City University (IE)
  • Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies (IE)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2018-02
Volume
610
Pages
A34
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W2774899903
Cited by
42
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
Sgr A*, Fe Kα emission, Compton continuum, giant molecular clouds, Central Molecular Zone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review