The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The trouble with
Abstract
The computed tomography dose index is typically measured using a long pencil ion chamber with cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) dosimetry phantoms. While this metric was useful in the era of single slice CT scanners with collimated slice thicknesses of or less, the efficiency of this metric in multi‐slice CT scanners with wide collimated x‐ray beams is unknown. Monte Carlo simulations were used to assess the efficiency of the parameter for wider beam collimations. The simulations utilized the geometry of a commercially available CT scanner, with modeled polyenergetic x‐ray spectra. Dose spread functions (DSFs) were computed along the length of diam rods placed at several radii in infinitely long diam (head) and diam (body) PMMA phantoms. The DSFs were used to compute radiation dose profiles for slice thicknesses from . efficiency was defined as the fraction of the dose along a PMMA rod collected in a length centered on the CT slice position, divided by the total dose deposited along an infinitely long PMMA rod. For a slice thickness, a x‐ray spectrum, and the PMMA head phantom, the efficiency of the was 82% and 90% for the center and peripheral holes, respectively. The corresponding efficiency values for the body phantom were 63% and 88%. These values are reduced by only 1% when a slice thickness was studied, so the use of for wide x‐ray beams is no less valid than its use for beam widths. However, these data illustrate that the efficiency of the measurement even with beam widths is low and, consequently, dose computations which are derived from this metric may not be as accurate as desirable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An accurate method for computer‐generating tungsten anode x‐ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV
Boone, J. M., & Seibert, J. A. (1997) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.597953 · Cited by 706
Self-citationAAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT: Radiation Dose in CT
McNitt-Gray, M. F. (2002) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.226025128 · Cited by 612
A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography
Shope, T. B., Gagne, R. M., & Johnson, G. C. (1981) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.594995 · Cited by 435
Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnant Patients: Fetal Radiation Dose with Helical CT
Winer-Muram, H. T., Boone, J. M., Brown, H. L., Jennings, S. G., Mabie, W. C., & Lombardo, G. T. (2002) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2242011581 · Cited by 329
Self-citationMcCollough, C. H., & Schueler, B. A. (2000) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598948 · Cited by 291
A new look at CT dose measurement: Beyond CTDI
Dixon, R. L. (2003) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1576952 · Cited by 202
Small-Animal X-ray Dose from Micro-CT
Boone, J. M., Velazquez, O., & Cherry, S. R. (2004) · Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1162/15353500200404118 · Cited by 201
Self-citationBoone, J. M., Shah, N., & Nelson, T. R. (2004) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1636571 · Cited by 157
Self-citationEnlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone‐beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry
Mori, S., Endo, M., Nishizawa, K., Tsunoo, T., Aoyama, T., Fujiwara, H., & Murase, K. (2005) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1877852 · Cited by 143
Huda, W. (2002) · Pediatric Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00247-002-0796-2 · Cited by 88
Cited by
On the visualisation of detrital age distributions
Vermeesch, P. (2012) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.04.021 · Cited by 1,530
Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology
Ludlow, J. B., & Ivanovic, M. (2008) · Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology · doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.018 · Cited by 872
Strategies for Reducing Radiation Dose in CT
McCollough, C. H., Primak, A. N., Braun, N., Kofler, J., Yu, L., & Christner, J. (2009) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006 · Cited by 842
Beauty Contests and Iterated Expectations in Asset Markets
Allen, F., Morris, S., & Shin, H. S. (2006) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhj036 · Cited by 572
Snowmass2021—Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension
Di Valentino, E., Anchordoqui, L. A., Akarsu, Ö., Ali-Haimoud, Y., Amendola, L., Arendse, N., Asgari, M., Ballardini, M., Basilakos, S., Battistelli, E., et al. (2021) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102605 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Boone, J. M.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-20
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1364-1371
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2809566106
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 23.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The trouble with. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.2713240
- The paper
- Boone, J. M. (2007). The trouble with. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2713240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.