Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The trouble with

Boone, John M.·2007·Medical Physics

Abstract

The computed tomography dose index is typically measured using a long pencil ion chamber with cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) dosimetry phantoms. While this metric was useful in the era of single slice CT scanners with collimated slice thicknesses of or less, the efficiency of this metric in multi‐slice CT scanners with wide collimated x‐ray beams is unknown. Monte Carlo simulations were used to assess the efficiency of the parameter for wider beam collimations. The simulations utilized the geometry of a commercially available CT scanner, with modeled polyenergetic x‐ray spectra. Dose spread functions (DSFs) were computed along the length of diam rods placed at several radii in infinitely long diam (head) and diam (body) PMMA phantoms. The DSFs were used to compute radiation dose profiles for slice thicknesses from . efficiency was defined as the fraction of the dose along a PMMA rod collected in a length centered on the CT slice position, divided by the total dose deposited along an infinitely long PMMA rod. For a slice thickness, a x‐ray spectrum, and the PMMA head phantom, the efficiency of the was 82% and 90% for the center and peripheral holes, respectively. The corresponding efficiency values for the body phantom were 63% and 88%. These values are reduced by only 1% when a slice thickness was studied, so the use of for wide x‐ray beams is no less valid than its use for beam widths. However, these data illustrate that the efficiency of the measurement even with beam widths is low and, consequently, dose computations which are derived from this metric may not be as accurate as desirable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1118/1.2713240

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Boone, J. M.
Venue
Medical Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-20
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
1364-1371
ISSN
  • 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-4209
OpenAlex
W2809566106
Cited by
417
References
13
FWCI
23.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The trouble with. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.2713240
The paper
Boone, J. M. (2007). The trouble with. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2713240

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.