The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Irradiation of gold nanoparticles by x‐rays: Monte Carlo simulation of dose enhancements and the spatial properties of the secondary electrons production
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to understand the characteristics of secondary electrons generated from the interaction of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) with x‐rays as a function of nanoparticle size and beam energy and thereby further the understanding of GNP‐enhanced radiotherapy. Methods: The effective range, deflection angle, dose deposition, energy, and interaction processes of electrons produced from the interaction of x‐rays with a GNP were calculated by Monte Carlo simulations. The GEANT4 code was used to simulate and track electrons generated from a 2, 50, and 100 nm diameter GNP when it is irradiated with a 50 kVp, 250 kVp, cobalt‐60, and 6 MV photon beam in water. Results: When a GNP was present, depending on the beam energies used, secondary electron production was increased by 10‐ to 2000‐fold compared to an absence of a GNP. Low‐energy photon beams were much more efficient at interacting with the GNP by two to three orders of magnitude compared to MV energies and increased the deflection angle. GNPs with larger diameters also contributed more dose. The majority of the energy deposition was outside the GNP, rather than self‐absorbed by the nanoparticle. The mean effective range of electron tracks for the beams tested ranged from approximately to 1 mm. Conclusions: These simulated results yield important insights concerning the spatial distributions and elevated dose in GNP‐enhanced radiotherapy. The authors conclude that the irradiation of GNP at lower photon energies will be more efficient for cell killing. This conclusion is consistent with published studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Basic Properties of Gold Nanoparticles and their Applications in Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment
Bai, X., Wang, Y., Song, Z., Feng, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, D., & Feng, L. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21072480 · Cited by 377
Dou, Y., Guo, Y., Li, X., Li, X., Wang, S., Wang, L., Lv, G., Zhang, X., Wang, H., Gong, X., et al. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b07473 · Cited by 288
Roadmap to Clinical Use of Gold Nanoparticles for Radiation Sensitization
Schuemann, J., Berbeco, R., Chithrani, D. B., Cho, S. H., Kumar, R., McMahon, S. J., Sridhar, S., & Krishnan, S. (2016) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.032 · Cited by 253
Hullo, M., Grall, R., Perrot, Y., Mathé, C., Ménard, V., Yang, X., Lacombe, S., Porcel, E., Villagrasa, C., Chevillard, S., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22094436 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Leung, M. K. K., Chow, J. C. L., Chithrani, B. D., Lee, M. J. G., Oms, B., & Jaffray, D. A.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 624-631
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W1988513860
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Irradiation of gold nanoparticles by x‐rays: Monte Carlo simulation of dose enhancements and the spatial properties of the secondary electrons production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.3539623
- The paper
- Leung, M. K. K., Chow, J. C. L., Chithrani, B. D., Lee, M. J. G., Oms, B., & Jaffray, D. A. (2011). Irradiation of gold nanoparticles by x‐rays: Monte Carlo simulation of dose enhancements and the spatial properties of the secondary electrons production. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3539623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.