The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrocardiogram‐correlated image reconstruction from subsecond spiral computed tomography scans of the heart
Abstract
Subsecond computed tomography (CT) scanning offers potential for improved heart imaging. We therefore developed and validated dedicated reconstruction algorithms for imaging the heart with subsecond spiral CT utilizing electrocardiogram (ECG) information. We modified spiral CT z‐interpolation algorithms on a subsecond spiral CT scanner. Two new classes of algorithms were investigated: (a) 180°CI (cardio interpolation), a piecewise linear interpolation between adjacent spiral data segments belonging to the same heart phase where segments are selected by correlation with the simultaneously recorded ECG signal and (b) 180°CD (cardio delta), a partial scan reconstruction of with angle, resulting in reduced effective scan times of less than 0.5 s. Computer simulations as well as processing of clinical data collected with 0.75 s scan time were carried out to evaluate these new approaches. Both 180°CI and 180°CD provided significant improvements in image quality. Motion artifacts in the reconstructed images were largely reduced as compared to standard spiral reconstructions; in particular, coronary calcifications were delineated more sharply and multiplanar reformations showed improved contiguity. However, new artifacts in the image plane are introduced, mostly due to the combination of different data segments. ECG‐oriented image reconstructions improve the quality of heart imaging with spiral CT significantly. Image quality and the display of coronary calcification appear adequate to assess coronary calcium measurements with conventional subsecond spiral CT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography
Agatston, A. S., Janowitz, W. R., Hildner, F. J., Zusmer, N. R., Viamonte, M., & Detrano, R. (1990) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t · Cited by 7,786
Cited by
Graham (2007) · doi:10.1097/01.hjr.0000277983.23934.c9 · Cited by 1,647
European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: Executive summary
Graham, I. (2007) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.08.024 · Cited by 722
4D-CT imaging of a volume influenced by respiratory motion on multi-slice CT
Pan, T., Lee, T.-Y., Rietzel, E., & Chen, G. T. Y. (2004) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1639993 · Cited by 624
Graham, I., Atar, D., Borch-Johnsen, K., Boysen, G., Burell, G., Cifkova, R., Dallongeville, J., Backer, G. D., Ebrahim, S., Gjelsvik, B., et al. (2007) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.hjr.0000277984.31558.c4 · Cited by 281
De Backer, G., Ambrosioni, E., Broch-Johnsen, K., Brotons, C., Cifkova, R., Dallongeville, J., Ebrahim, S., Faergeman, O., Graham, I., Mancia, G., et al. (2003) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00149831-200312001-00001 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Kachelriess, M., & Kalender, W. A.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2417-2431
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2095674432
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrocardiogram‐correlated image reconstruction from subsecond spiral computed tomography scans of the heart. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.598453
- The paper
- Kachelriess, M., & Kalender, W. A. (1998). Electrocardiogram‐correlated image reconstruction from subsecond spiral computed tomography scans of the heart. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.