Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements

Kalender, Willi A., Wolf, Heiko, Suess, Christoph·1999·Medical Physics

Abstract

Theoretical considerations and simulation studies have led to the expectation that patient dose in CT (computed tomography) can be reduced significantly without a concomitant loss in image quality if tube current is modulated according to rotation angle-dependent x-ray attenuation. In this study, the simulation results presented in Part I were validated with phantoms. We used one cylindrical, two oval, and one elliptical phantom, available both as mathematical descriptions and in physical form, to mimic different parts of the human anatomy. Prototype hardware was available to control tube current on a commercial clinical CT scanner. The potential for dose reduction was evaluated for sinusoidal and attenuation-based current modulation for variable modulation amplitudes. Agreement between simulations and measured results was better than within 10%. Dose reduction values of 8%-56% were found depending on the phantom geometry and tube current modulation function. Attenuation-based tube current modulation consistently yielded higher reduction than fixed-shape sinusoidal modulation functions. For the shoulder phantom and 70% modulation amplitude, 44.6% dose reduction was measured as compared to 34.1% for sinusoidal modulation. A maximum of 56% was measured for the shoulder phantom including inserts. Specifying mAs reduction as an estimate for dose reduction proved to be a valid and conservative estimate; measured dose is reduced more strongly than the total mAs product both centrally and on average. First patient studies confirm the results of simulation and phantom studies. We conclude that attenuation-based online tube current control has great potential for reducing patient dose in CT and that it should be made generally available for clinical use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1118/1.598738

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Kalender, W. A., Wolf, H., & Suess, C.
Venue
Medical Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-11
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
2248-2253
ISSN
0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063887054
Cited by
345
References
0
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.598738
The paper
Kalender, W. A., Wolf, H., & Suess, C. (1999). Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598738

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.