The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To investigate a novel locally adaptive projection space denoising algorithm for low‐dose CT data. Methods: The denoising algorithm is based on bilateral filtering, which smooths values using a weighted average in a local neighborhood, with weights determined according to both spatial proximity and intensity similarity between the center pixel and the neighboring pixels. This filtering is locally adaptive and can preserve important edge information in the sinogram, thus maintaining high spatial resolution. A CT noise model that takes into account the bowtie filter and patient‐specific automatic exposure control effects is also incorporated into the denoising process. The authors evaluated the noise‐resolution properties of bilateral filtering incorporating such a CT noise model in phantom studies and preliminary patient studies with contrast‐enhanced abdominal CT exams. Results: On a thin wire phantom, the noise‐resolution properties were significantly improved with the denoising algorithm compared to commercial reconstruction kernels. The noise‐resolution properties on low‐dose (40 mA s) data after denoising approximated those of conventional reconstructions at twice the dose level. A separate contrast plate phantom showed improved depiction of low‐contrast plates with the denoising algorithm over conventional reconstructions when noise levels were matched. Similar improvement in noise‐resolution properties was found on CT colonography data and on five abdominal low‐energy (80 kV) CT exams. In each abdominal case, a board‐certified subspecialized radiologist rated the denoised 80 kV images markedly superior in image quality compared to the commercially available reconstructions, and denoising improved the image quality to the point where the 80 kV images alone were considered to be of diagnostic quality. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that bilateral filtering incorporating a CT noise model can achieve a significantly better noise‐resolution trade‐off than a series of commercial reconstruction kernels. This improvement in noise‐resolution properties can be used for improving image quality in CT and can be translated into substantial dose reduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion
Perona, P., & Malik, J. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.56205 · Cited by 12,119
Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure
Brenner, D. J., & Hall, E. J. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra072149 · Cited by 8,748
Bilateral Filtering for Gray and Color Images
Tomasi, C., & Manduchi, R. (2002) · Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271) · doi:10.1109/iccv.1998.710815 · Cited by 8,177
Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging
Kak, A. C., & Slaney, M. (2001) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719277 · Cited by 5,809
Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience
Johnson, T. R. C., Krauß, B., Sedlmair, M., Grasruck, M., Bruder, H., Morhard, D., Fink, C., Weckbach, S., Lenhard, M., Schmidt, B., et al. (2007) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0517-6 · Cited by 1,510
Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances
Hsieh, J. (2015) · doi:10.1117/3.2197756 · Cited by 1,400
The transformation of poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data
ANSCOMBE, F. J. (1948) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/35.3-4.246 · Cited by 1,300
Barrett, H. H., Myers, K. J., & Rathee, S. (2004) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1677252 · Cited by 1,065
A three‐dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT
Thibault, J., Sauer, K. D., Bouman, C. A., & Hsieh, J. (2007) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.2789499 · Cited by 937
On the origin of the bilateral filter and ways to improve it
Elad, M. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2002.801126 · Cited by 791
Cited by
Yang, Q., Yan, P., Zhang, Y., Yu, H., Shi, Y., Mou, X., Kalra, M. K., Zhang, Y., Sun, L., & Wang, G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2827462 · Cited by 1,630
aLow-dose CT via convolutional neural network
Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W., Liao, P., Li, K., Zhou, J., & Wang, G. (2017) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.8.000679 · Cited by 755
Shan, H., Padole, A., Homayounieh, F., Kruger, U., Khera, R. D., Nitiwarangkul, C., Kalra, M. K., & Wang, G. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0057-9 · Cited by 417
Li, M., Hsu, W., Xie, X., Cong, J., & Gao, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.2968472 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Manduca, A., Yu, L., Trzasko, J. D., Khaylova, N., Kofler, J. M., McCollough, C. M., & Fletcher, J. G.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4911-4919
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W1964231221
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.3232004
- The paper
- Manduca, A., Yu, L., Trzasko, J. D., Khaylova, N., Kofler, J. M., McCollough, C. M., & Fletcher, J. G. (2009). Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3232004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.