Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT

Open access
Manduca, Armando, Yu, Lifeng, Trzasko, Joshua D., Khaylova, Natalia, Kofler, James M., McCollough, Cynthia M., Fletcher, Joel G.·2009·Medical Physics

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate a novel locally adaptive projection space denoising algorithm for low‐dose CT data. Methods: The denoising algorithm is based on bilateral filtering, which smooths values using a weighted average in a local neighborhood, with weights determined according to both spatial proximity and intensity similarity between the center pixel and the neighboring pixels. This filtering is locally adaptive and can preserve important edge information in the sinogram, thus maintaining high spatial resolution. A CT noise model that takes into account the bowtie filter and patient‐specific automatic exposure control effects is also incorporated into the denoising process. The authors evaluated the noise‐resolution properties of bilateral filtering incorporating such a CT noise model in phantom studies and preliminary patient studies with contrast‐enhanced abdominal CT exams. Results: On a thin wire phantom, the noise‐resolution properties were significantly improved with the denoising algorithm compared to commercial reconstruction kernels. The noise‐resolution properties on low‐dose (40 mA s) data after denoising approximated those of conventional reconstructions at twice the dose level. A separate contrast plate phantom showed improved depiction of low‐contrast plates with the denoising algorithm over conventional reconstructions when noise levels were matched. Similar improvement in noise‐resolution properties was found on CT colonography data and on five abdominal low‐energy (80 kV) CT exams. In each abdominal case, a board‐certified subspecialized radiologist rated the denoised 80 kV images markedly superior in image quality compared to the commercially available reconstructions, and denoising improved the image quality to the point where the 80 kV images alone were considered to be of diagnostic quality. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that bilateral filtering incorporating a CT noise model can achieve a significantly better noise‐resolution trade‐off than a series of commercial reconstruction kernels. This improvement in noise‐resolution properties can be used for improving image quality in CT and can be translated into substantial dose reduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1118/1.3232004

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 360

Metadata

Authors
Manduca, A., Yu, L., Trzasko, J. D., Khaylova, N., Kofler, J. M., McCollough, C. M., & Fletcher, J. G.
Venue
Medical Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-02
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
4911-4919
ISSN
  • 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-4209
OpenAlex
W1964231221
Cited by
360
References
21
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.3232004
The paper
Manduca, A., Yu, L., Trzasko, J. D., Khaylova, N., Kofler, J. M., McCollough, C. M., & Fletcher, J. G. (2009). Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3232004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.