The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Kruskal Space and the Uniformly Accelerated Frame
Abstract
The striking formal similarities between the diagram of Kruskal space in general relativity and that of the uniformly accelerated rigid rod in special relativity are shown to be the result of certain physical similarities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Notes on black-hole evaporation
Unruh, W. G. (1976) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.870 · Cited by 4,850
Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Riemannian space-time
Fulling, S. A. (1973) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2850 · Cited by 1,044
Scalar production in schwarzschild and rindler metrics
Davies, P. C. W. (1975) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/8/4/022 · Cited by 1,005
Gravitational field of vacuum domain walls
Vilenkin, A. (1983) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90554-3 · Cited by 408
Thermal stress tensors in static Einstein spaces
Page, D. N. (1982) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.25.1499 · Cited by 291
Relativistic quantum information
Mann, R. B., & Ralph, T. C. (2012) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/22/220301 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Rindler, W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physics
- Published
- 1966-12-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1174-1178
- ISSN
- 0002-9505 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2909
- OpenAlex
- W2036938936
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
