Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sources of variation in profile analysis. I. Individual differences and extended training

Drennan, Ward R., Watson, Charles S.·2001·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
DOI 10.1121/1.1408310
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated two sources of variance in the ability to discriminate auditory profiles: individual differences and extended training. The goals of the study were (1) to determine the range and origins of individual differences in profile analysis and (2) to determine whether those who initially had poor sensitivity to changes in spectral shape could eventually acquire finer sensitivity. Profile stimuli had 11 components with equal-log spacing from 200–2200 Hz. Thresholds ranged from −1 to −25 dB (signal level relative to the context level) across 46 listeners. The correlation between spectral-shape discrimination thresholds after 2000 trials and pure-tone intensity-discrimination thresholds was 0.36. The range of individual differences for pure-tone intensity discrimination and spectral-shape discrimination was about the same. Two groups of listeners were given extended practice on the profile task, one group that showed low thresholds after an initial 2000 trials of practice and another that showed much higher initial thresholds. All listeners improved during the course of the first 2000 trials of training. Most of the poor listeners continued to improve during 9000 trials of training. Individual differences in the listeners’ sensitivity to changes in spectral shape still existed after the extended practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.1408310

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Drennan, W. R., & Watson, C. S.
Affiliations
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47406
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Publisher
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
2491-2497
ISSN
  • 0001-4966
  • 1520-8524
DOI
10.1121/1.1408310
Cited by
15
References
26
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.