The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners
Abstract
When listening to languages learned at a later age, speech intelligibility is generally lower than when listening to one’s native language. The main purpose of this study is to quantify speech intelligibility in noise for specific populations of non-native listeners, only broadly addressing the underlying perceptual and linguistic processing. An easy method is sought to extend these quantitative findings to other listener populations. Dutch subjects listening to Germans and English speech, ranging from reasonable to excellent proficiency in these languages, were found to require a 1–7 dB better speech-to-noise ratio to obtain 50% sentence intelligibility than native listeners. Also, the psychometric function for sentence recognition in noise was found to be shallower for non-native than for native listeners (worst-case slope around the 50% point of 7.5%/dB, compared to 12.6%/dB for native listeners). Differences between native and non-native speech intelligibility are largely predicted by linguistic entropy estimates as derived from a letter guessing task. Less effective use of context effects (especially semantic redundancy) explains the reduced speech intelligibility for non-native listeners. While measuring speech intelligibility for many different populations of listeners (languages, linguistic experience) may be prohibitively time consuming, obtaining predictions of non-native intelligibility from linguistic entropy may help to extend the results of this study to other listener populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1906875 · Cited by 2,837
Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1006/jpho.1997.0052 · Cited by 890
Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences
Plomp, R., & Mimpen, A. M. (1979) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/00206097909072618 · Cited by 722
Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics
Bradlow, A. R., Torretta, G. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1996) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(96)00063-5 · Cited by 613
Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1985) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.2801.96 · Cited by 462
Age of Second-Language Acquisition and Perception of Speech in Noise
Mayo, L. H., Florentine, M., & Buus, S. (1997) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jslhr.4003.686 · Cited by 454
Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition
Boothroyd, A., & Nittrouer, S. (1988) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.396976 · Cited by 385
The detection of French accent by American listeners
Flege, J. E. (1984) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.391256 · Cited by 366
Versfeld, N. J., Daalder, L., Festen, J. M., & Houtgast, T. (2000) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.428451 · Cited by 341
Self-citationBradlow, A. R., & Pisoni, D. B. (1999) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.427952 · Cited by 331
Cited by
Foreign Accent: The Phenomenon of Non-native Speech
Moyer, A. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511794407 · Cited by 304
Defining a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI
Narain, C. (2003) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg083 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- van Wijngaarden, S. J., Steeneken, H. J. M., & Houtgast, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1906-1916
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W1966022238
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 9.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1456928
- The paper
- van Wijngaarden, S. J., Steeneken, H. J. M., & Houtgast, T. (2002). Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1456928
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.