Cited by 106Emotion and Mood RecognitionPhonetics and Phonology ResearchVoice and Speech Disorders

Manifestations of task-induced stress in the acoustic speech signal.

Hecker, Michael H. L., Stevens, Kenneth N., von Bismarck, Gottfried, Williams, Carl E.·1968·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

In order to induce stress in an experimental subject, a task involving the addition of numbers under time pressure was developed. The subject was required to read six meters and to announce the sum of his readings, together with a test phrase. By controlling the duration of the meter display, the experimenter could vary the level of stress induced in the subject. For each of 10 subjects, numerous verbal responses were obtained while the subject was under stress and while he was relaxed. Contrasting responses containing the same test phrase were assembled into paired-comparison listening tests. Listeners could identify the stressful responses of some subjects with better than 90% accuracy and of others only at chance level. The test phrases from contrasting responses were analyzed with respect to level and fundamental frequency, and spectrograms of these test phrases were examined. The results indicate that task-induced stress can produce a number of characteristic changes in the acoustic speech signal. Most of these changes are attributable to modifications in the amplitude, frequency, and detailed waveform of the glottal pulses. Other changes result from differences in articulation. Although the manifestations of stress varied considerably from subject to subject, the test phrases of most subjects exhibited some consistent effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.1911241

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hecker et al. (1968) found individual reactivity in F0 during task-induced cognitive load controlled by setting time-constraints in a read-aloud calculation task.

    “They found individual reactivity in F0.”

    From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Hecker et al. (1968)

  • Hecker et al. (1968) suggested that individual differences may be due to different manners to control a stress response.

    “Hecker et al. (1968) suggested, as a consequence of inconsistency in their study, that individual differences may be due to different manners to control a stress response.”

    From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Hecker et al. (1968)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hecker, M. H. L., Stevens, K. N., von Bismarck, G., & Williams, C. E.
Affiliations
Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts 92138
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1968-10-01
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
993-1001
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2045014868
Cited by
106
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Air Force Research Laboratory
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
speech under stress, fundamental frequency, glottal pulse, amplitude modulation, spectrographic analysis, articulation, time pressure
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychometrics, Speech, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review