Manifestations of task-induced stress in the acoustic speech signal.
Abstract
In order to induce stress in an experimental subject, a task involving the addition of numbers under time pressure was developed. The subject was required to read six meters and to announce the sum of his readings, together with a test phrase. By controlling the duration of the meter display, the experimenter could vary the level of stress induced in the subject. For each of 10 subjects, numerous verbal responses were obtained while the subject was under stress and while he was relaxed. Contrasting responses containing the same test phrase were assembled into paired-comparison listening tests. Listeners could identify the stressful responses of some subjects with better than 90% accuracy and of others only at chance level. The test phrases from contrasting responses were analyzed with respect to level and fundamental frequency, and spectrograms of these test phrases were examined. The results indicate that task-induced stress can produce a number of characteristic changes in the acoustic speech signal. Most of these changes are attributable to modifications in the amplitude, frequency, and detailed waveform of the glottal pulses. Other changes result from differences in articulation. Although the manifestations of stress varied considerably from subject to subject, the test phrases of most subjects exhibited some consistent effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hecker et al. (1968) found individual reactivity in F0 during task-induced cognitive load controlled by setting time-constraints in a read-aloud calculation task.
“They found individual reactivity in F0.”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Hecker et al. (1968)
Hecker et al. (1968) suggested that individual differences may be due to different manners to control a stress response.
“Hecker et al. (1968) suggested, as a consequence of inconsistency in their study, that individual differences may be due to different manners to control a stress response.”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Hecker et al. (1968)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer.
Bem, D. J., & Honorton, C. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.4 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance
Van Puyvelde, M., Neyt, X., McGlone, F., & Pattyn, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01994 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Acoustic analysis of induced vocal stressby means of cognitive workload tasks
Mendoza, E., & Carballo, G. (1998) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(98)80017-9 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Time-and spectrum- related variabilities in stressed speech under laboratory and real conditions.
Ruiz, R., Absil, E., Harmegnies, B., Legros, C., & Poch, D. (1996) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(96)00048-9 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Cosic, K., Popovic, S., Sarlija, M., Mijic, I., Kokot, M., Kesedzic, I., Strangman, G., Ivkovic, V., & Zhang, Q. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2957357 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hecker, M. H. L., Stevens, K. N., von Bismarck, G., & Williams, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts 92138
- ORCID
- Stevens, Kenneth N.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1968-10-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 993-1001
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2045014868
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (1969-02-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Air Force Research Laboratory
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Keywords
- speech under stress, fundamental frequency, glottal pulse, amplitude modulation, spectrographic analysis, articulation, time pressure
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Psychometrics, Speech, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review