The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hemispheric Specialization for Speech Perception
Abstract
Earlier experiments with dichotically presented nonsense syllables had suggested that perception of the sounds of speech depends upon unilateral processors located in the cerebral hemisphere dominant for language. Our aim in this study was to pull the speech signal apart to test its components in order to determine, if possible, which aspects of the perceptual process depend upon the specific language processing machinery of the dominant hemisphere. The stimuli were spoken consonant-vowel-consonant syllables presented in dichotic pairs which contrasted in only one phone (initial stop consonant, final stop consonant, or vowel). Significant right-ear advantages were found for initial and final stop consonants, nonsignificant right-ear advantages for six medial vowels, and significant right-ear advantages for the articulatory features of voicing and place of production in stop consonants. Analysis of correct responses and errors showed that consonant features are processed independently, in agreement with earlier research employing other methods. Evidence is put forward for the view that specialization of the dominant hemisphere in speech perception is due to its possession of a linguistic device, not to specialized capacities for auditory analysis. We have concluded that, while the general auditory system common to both hemispheres is equipped to extract the auditory parameters of a speech signal, the dominant hemisphere may be specialized for the extraction of linguistic features from those parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.171.3968.303 · Cited by 2,154
Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms
Doupe, A. J., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567 · Cited by 1,633
Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels
Pisoni, D. B. (1973) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03214136 · Cited by 608
Seeing, Doing, and Knowing: A Philosophical Theory of Sense Perception
Matthen, M. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199268509.001.0001 · Cited by 333
Phonetic Perception and the Temporal Cortex
Jäncke, L., Wüstenberg, T., Scheich, H., & Heinze, H.-J. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1027 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Shankweiler, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1970-08-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2B
- Pages
- 579-594
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W1965365831
- Cited by
- 749
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hemispheric Specialization for Speech Perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1912174
- The paper
- Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Shankweiler, D. (1970). Hemispheric Specialization for Speech Perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.