The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres
Abstract
Two experiments were performed to evaluate the perceptual relationships between 16 music instrument tones. The stimuli were computer synthesized based upon an analysis of actual instrument tones, and they were perceptually equalized for loudness, pitch, and duration. Experiment 1 evaluated the tones with respect to perceptual similarities, and the results were treated with multidimensional scaling techniques and hierarchic clustering analysis. A three-dimensional scaling solution, well matching the clustering analysis, was found to be interpretable in terms of (1) the spectral energy distribution; (2) the presence of synchronicity in the transients of the higher harmonics, along with the closely related amount of spectral fluctuation within the the tone through time; and (3) the presence of low-amplitude, high-frequency energy in the initial attack segment; an alternate interpretation of the latter two dimensions viewed the cylindrical distribution of clusters of stimulus points about the spectral energy distribution, grouping on the basis of musical instrument family (with two exceptions). Experiment 2 was a learning task of a set of labels for the 16 tones. Confusions were examined in light of the similarity structure for the tones from experiment 1, and one of the family-grouping exceptions was found to be reflected in the difficulty of learning the labels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Music training for the development of auditory skills
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2882 · Cited by 1,115
Auditory Brain Stem Response to Complex Sounds: A Tutorial
Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2010) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3181cdb272 · Cited by 775
Perception of material from contact sounds
Klatzky, R. L., Pai, D. K., & Krotkov, E. P. (2000) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474600566907 · Cited by 187
Eerola, T., Ferrer, R., & Alluri, V. (2012) · Music Perception · doi:10.1525/mp.2012.30.1.49 · Cited by 122
Grossberg, S. (2017) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2016.11.003 · Cited by 120
Scaling of Neural Responses to Visual and Auditory Motion in the Human Cerebellum
Baumann, O., & Mattingley, J. B. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5661-09.2010 · Cited by 78
There’s More to Timing than Time
Danielsen, A., Brøvig, R., Bøhler, K. K., Câmara, G. S., Haugen, M. R., Jacobsen, E., Johansson, M. S., Lartillot, O., Nymoen, K., Oddekalv, K. A., et al. (2024) · Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1525/mp.2024.41.3.176 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Grey, J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1977-05-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1270-1277
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W1986595194
- Cited by
- 726
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.