The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber
Abstract
A litter of four cats, born and raised in a soundproofed chamber, was studied in an attempt to determine which, if any, features of the auditory-nerve response from routinely available cats might be due to the chronic effects of noise exposure. Two features of routine-normal response were especially suspect in this regard: (1) a ’’notch’’ in the distribution of single-unit thresholds centered at characteristic frequencies (CF’s) near 3 kHz and (2) a compression of the distribution of rates of spontaneous discharge for units with CF above 10 kHz. A third feature of response in routine animals was the presence of a small number (roughly 10%) of units with virtually no spontaneous discharge and very high thresholds, sometimes 80 dB less sensitive than high-spontaneous units of similar CF. In the data from chamber-raised animals, the high-spontaneous units showed exceptionally low thresholds at all CF regions, however, there were signs of the midfrequency notch in the threshold distribution of at least two of these animals. The compression of the spontaneous rate distribution was not seen in any of the three most sensitive animals. The data suggest that there is a significant amount of ’’normal pathology’’ in the high-CF units from routine animals. Low-spontaneous, high-threshold units were present in all four chamber-raised ears with the same characteristics as in routine animals (exceptionally narrow tuning curves and exceptionally low maximum discharge rates) and at roughly the same percentage of the unit sample. A class of units with medium spontaneous rates and intermediate thresholds could also be identified. The possible significance of a classification of auditory-nerve units according to spontaneous rate is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons
Ulanovsky, N., Las, L., & Nelken, I. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1032 · Cited by 1,049
Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
JORIS, P. X., SCHREINER, C. E., & REES, A. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2003 · Cited by 938
Sensory neuron diversity in the inner ear is shaped by activity
Shrestha, B. R., Chia, C., Wu, L., Kujawa, S. G., Liberman, M. C., & Goodrich, L. V. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.007 · Cited by 432
Self-citationLiberman, M. C., Dodds, L. W., & Pierce, S. (1990) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903010309 · Cited by 414
Self-citationKnipper, M., Van Dijk, P., Nunes, I., Rüttiger, L., & Zimmermann, U. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.08.002 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Liberman, M. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1978-02-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 442-455
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2161851299
- Cited by
- 1,203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.381736
- The paper
- Liberman, M. C. (1978). Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381736
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.