The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise
Abstract
Using an adaptive strategy, the effects of mild sensorineural hearing loss and adult listeners’ chronological age on speech recognition in babble were evaluated. The signal-to-babble ratio required to achieve 50% recognition was measured for three speech materials presented at soft to loud conversational speech levels. Four groups of subjects were tested: (1) normal-hearing listeners <44 years of age, (2) subjects <44 years old with mild sensorineural hearing loss and excellent speech recognition in quiet, (3) normal-hearing listeners >65 with normal hearing, and (4) subjects >65 years old with mild hearing loss and excellent performance in quiet. Groups 1 and 3, and groups 2 and 4 were matched on the basis of pure-tone thresholds, and thresholds for each of the three speech materials presented in quiet. In addition, groups 1 and 2 were similar in terms of mean age and age range, as were groups 3 and 4. Differences in performance in noise as a function of age were observed for both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners despite equivalent performance in quiet. Subjects with mild hearing loss performed significantly worse than their normal-hearing counterparts. These results and their implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Music training for the development of auditory skills
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2882 · Cited by 1,115
Agrawal, Y. (2008) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.168.14.1522 · Cited by 977
Auditory Brain Stem Response to Complex Sounds: A Tutorial
Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2010) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3181cdb272 · Cited by 775
At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer’s disease.
Albers, M. W., Gilmore, G. C., Kaye, J., Murphy, C., Wingfield, A., Bennett, D. A., Boxer, A. L., Buchman, A. S., Cruickshanks, K. J., Devanand, D. P., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.514 · Cited by 589
Cognitive aging and auditory information processing
Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2003) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992020309074641 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Dubno, J. R., Dirks, D. D., & Morgan, D. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1984-07-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-96
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2145124268
- Cited by
- 591
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.391011
- The paper
- Dubno, J. R., Dirks, D. D., & Morgan, D. E. (1984). Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.