The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel
Abstract
The major issues in relating acoustic waveforms of spoken vowels to perceived vowel categories are presented and discussed in terms of the author’s auditory-perceptual theory of phonetic recognition. A brief historical review of formant-ratio theory is presented, as well as an analysis of frequency scales that have been proposed for description of the vowel. It is illustrated that the monophthongal vowel sounds of American English can be represented as clustered in perceptual target zones within a three-dimensional auditory-perceptual space (APS), and it is shown that preliminary versions of these target zones segregate a corpus of vowels of American English with 93% accuracy. Furthermore, it is shown that the nonretroflex vowels of American English fall within a narrow slab within the APS, with spread vowels near the front of this slab and rounded vowels near the back. Retroflex vowels fall in a distinct region behind the vowel slab. Descriptions of the vowels within the APS are shown to be correlated with their descriptions in terms of dimensions of articulation and timbre. Additionally, issues related to talker normalization, coarticulation effects, segmentation, pitch, transposition, and diphthongization are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1906875 · Cited by 2,837
Cited by
Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.
Goldinger, S. D. (1998) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.251 · Cited by 1,587
Phonetic Feature Encoding in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus
Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1245994 · Cited by 993
Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production
Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (2006) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.001 · Cited by 879
Talker-specific learning in speech perception
Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206860 · Cited by 591
Infant vocalizations in response to speech: vocal imitation and developmental change
Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1996) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.417951 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, J. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1989-05-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2114-2134
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2090365329
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.397862
- The paper
- Miller, J. D. (1989). Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397862
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.