The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners’ perception of /r/ and /l/
Abstract
Recent experiments have demonstrated that category goodness influences the perception of vowels [Iverson and Kuhl, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 553–562 (1995)]; listeners show a perceptual magnet effect characterized by shrunken perceptual distances near excellent exemplars of vowel categories and stretched distances near poor exemplars. The present study extends this investigation by examining the relative influence of phonetic identification and category goodness on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/. Eighteen /ra/ and /la/ tokens were synthesized by varying F2 and F3 frequencies. Adult listeners identified and rated the goodness of individual stimuli, and rated the similarity of stimulus pairs. Multidimensional scaling analyses revealed that the perceptual space was shrunk near the best exemplars of each category and stretched near the category boundary. In addition, individual differences in /r/ identification corresponded to the degree of shrinking near the best exemplars of the /r/ category. The results demonstrate that category goodness and phonetic identification both contribute to the perception of /r/ and /l/.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The results suggest that linguistic experience produces mental maps for speech that differ substantially for speakers of different languages (40, 69, 79).”
From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [79]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A new view of language acquisition
Kuhl, P. K. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.22.11850 · Cited by 773
Self-citationBest, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. W. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1332378 · Cited by 680
“…speech learning model (SLM: Flege, 1986, 1990, 1995; cf. Guion et al., 2000), and Kuhl’s Native Language Magnet model (NLM: Grieser and Kuhl, 1989; Iverson and Kuhl, 1996; Kuhl, 1991, 1992; Kuhl et al., 1992) all presume that adults’ discrimination of non-native speech contrasts is…”
BackgroundA perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes
Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00198-1 · Cited by 693
“…becomes warped based on the statistical distribution of speech sounds in the infant's ambient language, reducing perceptual sensitivity near distribution peaks or prototypes (Iverson & Kuhl, 1995, 1996, 2000; Kuhl, 1991; Kuhl et al., 1992) and facilitating later stages of language acquisition.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationInfant vocalizations in response to speech: vocal imitation and developmental change
Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1996) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.417951 · Cited by 560
Self-citationSaito, K., & Lyster, R. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00639.x · Cited by 434
“…duration of F3) determine NS listeners’ categorical perceptions of English /®/ and /l/ contrasts based on natural speech tokens (e.g., Espy-Wilson, 1992; Flege, Takagi, & Mann, 1995) as well as synthesized samples (e.g., Hattori & Iverson, 2009; Iverson & Kuhl, 1996; Iverson et al., 2003).”
BackgroundEarly speech perception and later language development: implications for the “critical period”
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Padden, D., Nelson, T., & Pruitt, J. (2005) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9671948 · Cited by 482
“Finally,whenneuraldiscriminationof thenonnativecontrastwascorrelated with behavioral discrimination of the nonnative, the pattern of response was in the appropriate direction, though it was not significant, r = –.316, p = .147, n = 13, perhaps due to the smaller N in this condition (see Figure 5d).”
BackgroundSelf-citation(2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 339
Self-citationBi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek
Mennen, I. (2004) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.002 · Cited by 303
“All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.002 Flege, 1986, 1991, 1995; Iverson & Kuhl, 1995, 1996; Kuhl, 1991; Kuhl, Williams, Lacerda, Stevens, & Lindblom, 1992; Major, 2001).”
InfluentialForeign Accent: The Phenomenon of Non-native Speech
Moyer, A. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511794407 · Cited by 304
Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., & Morgan, J. L. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0017196 · Cited by 280
“In addition, the effect has been found in the /r/ and /l/ categories in English but not Japanese speakers (Iverson & Kuhl, 1996; Iverson et al., 2003), lending support to the idea of language-specific phonetic category prototypes.”
Early Speech Perception and Later Language Development: Implications for the "Critical Period"
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Padden, D. M., et al. (2005) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1207/s15473341lld0103&4_2 · Cited by 220
Self-citationIndividual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning
Chandrasekaran, B., Sampath, P. D., & Wong, P. C. M. (2010) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3445785 · Cited by 216
Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H. L., Matthies, M. L., Perrier, P., Vick, J. C., Wilhelms-Tricarico, R. F., & Zandipour, M. (2000) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1006/jpho.2000.0116 · Cited by 206
“…in studies of categorical perception (cf. Liberman, Harris, Ho!man & Gri$th, 1957; Liberman, Harris, Kinney & Lane, 1961; Pisoni, 1973) and increased discrimination abilities away from perceptual &&prototypes'' in studies of the perceptual magnet e!ect (cf. Kuhl, 1991; Iverson & Kuhl, 1995, 1996).”
BackgroundSelective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories.
Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.349 · Cited by 247
“Similarly, the acquisition of the English /r/–/l/ distinction by native speakers of Japanese (Bradlow, Akahane-Yamada, Pisoni, & Tohkura, 1999; Iverson & Kuhl, 1996; Lively, Pisoni, & Logan, 1992; Yamada, 1995; Yamada & Tohkura, 1992), while more likely to be an SC contrast, can also apparently be…”
BackgroundIterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs
Boutilier, C. E. (1996) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/bf00248151 · Cited by 181
Effects of language experience: neural commitment to language-specific auditory patterns
Zhang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Imada, T., Kotani, M., & Tohkura, Y. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.040 · Cited by 179
“The stimuli were two computer-synthesized series of sounds, /ra–la/ and /ba–wa/, adopted from previous behavioral studies (see Iverson and Kuhl, 1996; Miller and Liberman, 1979 for detailed description).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationInvestigating the role of attention in phonetic learning
Guion, S. G., & Pederson, E. (2007) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.17.09gui · Cited by 180
“More specifically, Iverson and Kuhl (1995; 1996) propose that”
BackgroundSpeech motor control: acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models.
Perkell, J., Matthies, M., Lane, H., Guenther, F., Wilhelms-Tricarico, R., Wozniak, J., & Guiod, P. (1997) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(97)00026-5 · Cited by 177
Liu, H.-M., Tsao, F., & Kuhl, P. K. (2005) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1898623 · Cited by 170
Self-citationEvans, B. G., & Iverson, P. (2003) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1635413 · Cited by 173
Self-citationStyles, S. J., & Gawne, L. (2017) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669517724807 · Cited by 178
“…structure of frequently heard sounds in one’s native language – a precursor to linguistically refined categorical perception of native language phonemes (Iverson & Kuhl, 1996; Kuhl, 2010; Maye, Werker, & Gerken, 2002; Werker & Tees, 1984); and second, ‘tuning’ to frequently heard sound…”
BackgroundSelective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories.
Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.349 · Cited by 150
Depolarizing the perceptual magnet effect
Lotto, A. J., Kluender, K. R., & Holt, L. L. (1998) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.423087 · Cited by 149
“Demonstrations of perceptual magnet effects have been described for several phonetic categories e.g., Davis and Kuhl, 1994; Iverson et al., 1994; Iverson and Kuhl, 1996; the effect has been elicited from infant listeners Grieser and Kuhl, 1989; Kuhl et al., 1992; Polka and Werker, 1994; it has been…”
BackgroundRepresentation of Sound Categories in Auditory Cortical Maps
Guenther, F. H., Nieto-Castañón, A., Ghosh, S., & Tourville, J. A. (2004) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/005 · Cited by 113
polysp: a polysystemic, phonetically-rich approach to speech understanding
Smith, R. H., & Hawkins, S. (2001) · ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) · Cited by 109
Effects of sign language experience on categorical perception of dynamic ASL pseudosigns
Best, C. T., Mathur, G., Miranda, K. A., & Lillo‐Martin, D. (2010) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.3.747 · Cited by 106
“…in sensitivity to gradient within-category phonetic variation, we also had participants make goodness-of-fit ratings following their categorization judgments (see Hallé et al., 1999; Hodgson & Miller, 1996; Iverson & Kuhl, 1996; Kuhl, Williams, Lacerda, Stevens, & Lindblom, 1992; Miller, 1994).”
BackgroundMethodThe climate system: an overview
Baede, A. P. M., Ahlonsou, E., Ding, Y., & SCHIMEL, D. S. (2001) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 115
Hallé, P., Best, C. T., & Levitt, A. G. (1999) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1006/jpho.1999.0097 · Cited by 97
Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. (2000) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03206929 · Cited by 99
Self-citationA unified account of categorical effects in phonetic perception
Kronrod, Y., Coppess, E., & Feldman, N. H. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1049-y · Cited by 87
“However , it was also found for the Swedish /y/ category (Kuhl et al., 1992; Aaltonen et al., 1997) as well as the lateral and retroflex liquids (/l/,/r/) in American English (Iverson & Kuhl, 1996; Iverson et al., 2003).”
BackgroundMismatch negativity (MMN) elicited by changes in phoneme length: A cross-linguistic study
Ylinen, S., Шестакова, А. Н., Huotilainen, M., Alku, P., & Näätänen, R. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.004 · Cited by 90
On the relationship between identification and discrimination of non-native nasal consonants
Harnsberger, J. D. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1371758 · Cited by 76
Inhibition Shapes Sex Selectivity in the Mouse Accessory Olfactory Bulb
Hendrickson, R. C., Krauthamer, S., Essenberg, J. M., & Holy, T. E. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2715-08.2008 · Cited by 69
A Single‐Stage Approach to Learning Phonological Categories: Insights From Inuktitut
Dillon, B., Dunbar, E., & Idsardi, W. J. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12008 · Cited by 69
“Views like this are sometimes cast as a rejection of the existence of phonemes (Johnson, 1997; Port & Leary, 2005; Silverman, 2006), but they may also be understood as the claim that the lexical level of encoding (traditionally, the phonemic encoding) does not abstract out phonological processes (Kenstowicz & Kisseber…”
Second-language phonology: the role of perception
Escudero, P. (2007) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230625396_5 · Cited by 68
Linguistic perception and second language acquisition
Boersma, P., Zonneveld, W., Kager, R., & Escudero, P. (2005) · Cited by 57
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., & de Boer, B. (2001) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03478.x · Cited by 57
Self-citationThe developmental trajectory of children's perception and production of English /r/-/l/
Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. L. (2013) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4802905 · Cited by 55
“In addition to the onset F3 formant frequency cue, onset F2 frequency has been implicated as a secondary cue to the /l-r/ distinction among adult speech productions (Polka and Strange, 1985; Yamada and Tohkura 1992; Iverson and Kuhl, 1996; Lotto et al., 2004).”
BackgroundSex Selectivity of Mouse Ultrasonic Songs
Guo, Z., & Holy, T. E. (2007) · Chemical Senses · doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm015 · Cited by 53
“Similarly, native speakers of English perceive mixtures of /r/ and /l/ sounds as one or the other depending upon the ratio of the 2 components (Iverson and Kuhl 1996).”
BackgroundEffects of acoustic–phonetic detail on cross-language speech production
Wilson, C., Davidson, L., & Martin, S. (2014) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.08.001 · Cited by 50
“Alternatively, it could be that correct responses in such tasks are not due to faithful perception at any level, but rather to category goodness differences among stimuli (Best, 1995; Best et al., 2001; Iverson & Kuhl, 1996; Miller, 1994).”
BackgroundChen, C., Xue, G., Mei, L., Chen, C., & Dong, Q. (2009) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(09)17811-1 · Cited by 49
“For more discussions about this topic, readers can refer to Perceptual Assimilation Model (Best et al., 2001) and Natural Language Magnet model (Iverson and Kuhl, 1996).”
Kim, D., & Clayards, M. A. (2019) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2019.1582787 · Cited by 51
“Perceptual magnet effects (Kuhl, 1991) suggest that the ambiguous tokens might be warped and perceived as more prototypical vowel productions and Iverson and Kuhl (1996) showed that more important dimensions are more strongly warped.”
BackgroundIverson, P., Ekanayake, D., Hamann, S., Sennema, A., & Evans, B. G. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1305 · Cited by 48
“In contrast, native English speakers have perceptual spaces for these stimuli that facilitate categorization, with low sensitivity near the best exemplars of /r/ and /l/ and high sensitivity at the category boundary ( Iverson & Kuhl, 1996 ).”
BackgroundSelf-citationVowel recognition via cochlear implants and noise vocoders: Effects of formant movement and duration
Iverson, P., Smith, C. A., & Evans, B. G. (2006) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2372453 · Cited by 40
Self-citationSleep duration predicts behavioral and neural differences in adult speech sound learning
Earle, F. S., Landi, N., & Myers, E. B. (2016) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2016.10.044 · Cited by 38
Olejarczuk, P., Kapatsinski, V. M., & Baayen, R. H. (2018) · Linguistics Vanguard · doi:10.1515/lingvan-2017-0020 · Cited by 33
“Typicality ratings are a common way to investigate graded category structure (e.g. Miller 1994), and correlate highly with perceptual magnet effects in category recognition (Kuhl 1991; Iverson and Kuhl 1996).”
BackgroundSchellenberg, E. G. (2001) · Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1525/mp.2001.19.2.223 · Cited by 37
“The idea of poor within-category discrimination involving prototypes was extended to speech perception by proponents of the “perceptual magnet effect” (Iverson & Kuhl, 1995, 1996, 2000; Kuhl, 1991).”
BackgroundInfluentialAtypical phonological processing impairs written word recognition in children with cochlear implants
Bouton, S., Colé, P., Willy Serniclaes, A., Duncan, L. G., & Giraud, A. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.1002796 · Cited by 33
“…estimates the category for each stimulus and then allows for comparing category estimates (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005), whereas identification assesses perceptual distances between stimuli, and their location relative to category boundaries (Iverson & Kuhl, 1996; Macmillan & Creelman, 1991).”
BackgroundBao, S., Chang, E. F., Teng, C., Heiser, M. A., & Merzenich, M. M. (2013) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.05.056 · Cited by 32
“Although the existence of language-specific differences in speech sound perception (Fox et al., 1995, Iverson and Kuhl, 1996) has long pointed to a role for early experience in shaping human speech perception, the contribution of early experience to categorical perception in non-human animals is…”
BackgroundConstantino, J. N., Yang, D., Gray, T., Gross, M. M., Abbacchi, A. M., Smith, S. C., Kohn, C. E., & Kuhl, P. K. (2006) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0269-9 · Cited by 32
“A well-known example is the manner in which monolingual Japanese subjects perceive ‘‘ra’’ and ‘‘la’’ as the same sound, whereas English speakers perceive a clear difference that has obvious linguistic relevance, as in the ability to distinguish the words ‘‘lock’’ and ‘‘rock’’ ( Iverson & Kuhl, 1996 ).”
Self-citationAdults’ perception of native and nonnative vowels: Implications for the perceptual magnet effect
Frieda, E. M., Walley, A. C., Flege, J. E., & Sloane, M. E. (1999) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211973 · Cited by 35
“Of course, research with other vowels is crucial, since studies of the perceptual magnet effect have thus far been limited primarily to / i / and / y/ (but see Davis & Kuhl, 1994; Iverson & Kuhl, 1996 ).”
BackgroundIverson, P. (2003) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1531985 · Cited by 31
Self-citationCategorical perception of speech stimuli in children at risk for reading difficulty
Breier, J. I., Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C. A., et al. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.003 · Cited by 31
Harnsberger, J. D. (2000) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.429610 · Cited by 28
Olsen, M. K. (2012) · Hispania · doi:10.1353/hpn.2012.a469667 · Cited by 29
“The Speech Learning Model (SLM) (Flege 1995), the Native Language Magnet Model (NLM) (Iverson and Kuhl 1996), and the Perceptual Assimilation Model (Best 1995) all predict that L2 input will at first be categorized with respect to L1 categories.”
MethodPrecision of working memory for speech sounds
Joseph, S., Iverson, P., Manohar, S., Fox, Z. V., Scott, S. K., & Husain, M. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.1002799 · Cited by 28
“Phonetic categories influence the perception of consonants (Liberman et al., 1967; Iverson & Kuhl, 1996) and vowels (Repp, 1984; Kuhl, 1991; Samuel, 2010).”
Self-citationElectrophysiological correlates of category goodness
Rivera‐Gaxiola, M., Johnson, M. H., Csibra, G., & Karmiloff‐Smith, A. (2000) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00218-7 · Cited by 25
A Rational Account of the Perceptual Magnet Effect
Feldman, N. H., & Griffiths, T. L. (2007) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 21
Perceptual and Neuronal Boundary Learned from Higher-Order Stimulus Probabilities
Köver, H., Gill, K., Tseng, Y.-T. L., & Bao, S. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3166-12.2013 · Cited by 17
“However, unlike in humans where the existence of language-specific differences in speech sound perception (Fox et al., 1995; Iverson and Kuhl, 1996) has long pointed to a role for early experience in shaping perception, perceptual boundaries in animals have often been assumed to be innate (Kuhl and…”
BackgroundComprehending auditory speech: previous and potential contributions of functional MRI
Evans, S., & McGettigan, C. (2017) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1272703 · Cited by 19
“…is a rich history of behavioural research using similarity distances to quantify perceptual relationships among speech sounds (Iverson et al., 2003; Iverson & Kuhl, 1995, 1996; Miller & Nicely, 1955) in ways that more closely capture the multidimensional nature of the speech signal (Kluender &…”
BackgroundPerception of English stress by Mandarin Chinese learners of English: An acoustic study
Wang, Q. (2008) · UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · Cited by 19
Perceptual Learning for Native and Non-native Speech
Baese‐Berk, M. M. (2018) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2018.08.001 · Cited by 19
Phonetic and Cognitive Bases of Sound Change
Kataoka, R. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 17
Barry, J. G., Blamey, P. J., & Martin, L. F. A. (2002) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699200110109811 · Cited by 15
“It has been successfully applied to many aspects of speech perception such as the perception of diŒerences in segmental structure (e.g., Iverson and Kuhl, 1996) or of voice quality eŒects such as nasality (e.g., Zraick, Liss, Dorman, Case, LaPointe and Beals, 2001).”
MethodThe perceptual magnet effect in Australian English vowels
Thyer, N., Hickson, L. M. H., & Dodd, B. J. (2000) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212057 · Cited by 15
Zhang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Imada, T., Iverson, P., Pruitt, J., Kotani, M., & Stevens, E. B. (2000) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2000-692 · Cited by 12
“Specific parameters were adopted from a previous study [19].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationOsmanski, M. S., & Wang, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2221756120 · Cited by 10
Perception of /r/ and /l/ in a stop cluster: Evidence of cross-modal context effects.
Green, K. P., & Norrix, L. W. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.166 · Cited by 11
Goss, S., & Tamaoka, K. (2014) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12076 · Cited by 10
“Models of speech perception such as the native language magnet (NLM) theory state that as we gain experience with our first language, our perceptual space is molded to the sound categories of that language (Iverson & Kuhl, 1996).”
BackgroundResultAuditory and Somatosensory Development for Speech in Later Childhood
Ayala, S. A., Eads, A., Kabakoff, H. M., Swartz, M. T., Shiller, D. M., Hill, J., Hitchcock, E. R., Preston, J. L., & McAllister, T. (2023) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00496 · Cited by 10
Features in Speech Perception and Lexical Access
Blumstein, S. E. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119184096.ch5 · Cited by 11
Limitations of the influence of English phonetics and phonology on L2 Spanish rhotics
Olsen, M. K. (2016) · Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics · doi:10.7557/1.5.2.3898 · Cited by 9
Task‐dependent activations of human auditory cortex to prototypical and nonprototypical vowels
Harinen, K., Aaltonen, O., Salo, E., Salonen, O. L. M., & Rinne, T. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21506 · Cited by 9
Liederman, J., Frye, R. E., Fisher, J. M., Greenwood, K., & Alexander, R. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196388 · Cited by 8
“Perhaps the best known is the perceptual magnet effect ( Iverson & Kuhl, 1996; Kuhl, 1991, 1994), whose interpretation remains controversial (e.g., Lotto, Kluender, & Holt, 1998).”
BackgroundKoyama, S., Akahane-Yamada, R., Gunji, A., Kubo, R., Roberts, T. P. L., Yabe, H., & Kakigi, R. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00037-5 · Cited by 9
Non-native contrasts in Tongan loans
Zuraw, K., O'Flynn, K. C., & Ward, K. S. (2019) · Phonology · doi:10.1017/s095267571900006x · Cited by 7
“…if Ø is actually a reasonably common exemplar of V, then we expect the perceptual space to be warped, such that Ø and V are perceived as more similar (e.g. Iverson & Kuhl 1996, where English speakers perceived the distance between two good tokens of /l/ as smaller than the distance between a good…”
L2 perception of English vowels: testing the validity of Kuhl's prototypes
Lecumberri, M. L. G., & Iragui, J. C. (1997) · Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses · doi:10.14198/raei.1997.10.06 · Cited by 7
Hampstead, B. M., Lacey, S., Ali, S., et al. (2010) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.02.021 · Cited by 7
“01, respectively [43,45].”
Individual differences in speech and nonspeech perception of frequency and duration
Makashay, M. J. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4784702 · Cited by 6
Willerman, R., & Kuhl, P. K. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.1109/icslp.1996.607149 · Cited by 6
“Research on speech perception shows that linguistic experience plays a substantial role in the perception of consonants in adults (Miyawaki et al., 1975; Iverson & Kuhl, 1996).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPerceptual development of phoneme contrasts in adults and children
Heeren, W. F. L. (2006) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 6
Psycho-Social Constraints on Naturalistic Adult Second Language Acquisition
Al-Kendi, A., & Khattab, G. (2021) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages6030129 · Cited by 6
Brain plasticity and phonetic training for English-as-a-second-language learners
Zhang, Y., & Cheng, B. (2011) · Cited by 5
Cortical representations for phonological quantity
Ylinen, S. (2006) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 5
Brasselet, R., & Arleo, A. (2018) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e20070527 · Cited by 4
“Iverson and Kuhl have shown the warping of the perceptual space using multi-dimensional scaling [19,20].”
MethodOu, J., & Law, S. (2019) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104700 · Cited by 4
Scott, S. K., & Evans, S. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1110-1304 · Cited by 4
The perception and production of palatal codas by Korean L2 learners of English
Huensch, A. (2013) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 4
Effects of Language Experience on Organization of Vowel Sounds
Lotto, A. J., Kluender, K. R., & Holt, L. L. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6614606 · Cited by 4
Phonetic Category Structure and Its Influence on Lexical Processing
Blumstein, S. E. (2004) · Cited by 4
Juan, V. S., Carol, L. I. N., MACKENZIE, H., Curtin, S. L., & Graham, S. A. (2018) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000918000466 · Cited by 3
“Thus, even short exposures to variable pronunciations can result in accommodation (see also Creel, 2012; Iverson & Kuhl, 1996).”
BackgroundPerception of Welsh vowel contrasts by Welsh-Spanish bilinguals in Argentina
Bell, E. (2017) · Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America · doi:10.3765/plsa.v2i0.4051 · Cited by 3
DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN CEREBRAL RESPONSES TO NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE VOWELS: A NIRS STUDY
Minagawa‐Kawai, Y., Naoi, N., Nishijima, N., et al. (2007) · Cited by 3
Comparing online versus laboratory measures of speech perception in older children and adolescents
McAllister, T., Preston, J. L., Ochs, L. C., Hill, J., & Hitchcock, E. R. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297530 · Cited by 2
Training humans in non-native phoneme perception using a monkey psychoacoustic procedure
Sinnott, J. M., Gonzales, C. L., Masood, A. F., & Ishihara, T. (2007) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2722236 · Cited by 2
Habilidades de percepción fónica en español / L2 y su relación con el nivel de dominio lingüístico
Canales, A. B. (2017) · Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada · doi:10.22201/enallt.01852647p.2017.65.727 · Cited by 1
The cross-linguistics perception of liquids: Motivation for the superclass
Howson, P., & Madathodiyil, I. (2023) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2023.05.002 · Cited by 2
The Interaction of Lexical and Discourse-Level Categories in Second Language Phonetics
Teague, K. L. (2011) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 2
The influence of L1 on auditory perception of Spanish/L2
Canales, A. B. (2016) · Loquens · doi:10.3989/loquens.2016.028 · Cited by 2
Ke, H., Pan, L., O'BRIEN, B. A., & Styles, S. J. (2024) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2024.2429039 · Cited by 6
“…refinement to align with the distributional properties of frequently heard speech sounds in the second half of the first year (e.g., Best, 1999; Iverson & Kuhl, 1996; MacKain et al., 1981; Polka & Bohn, 1996, 2011; Schwartz et al., 2009; Tees & Werker, 1984) as described in perceptual change…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1996-02-01
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1130-1140
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2038622214
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007391, HD 07391)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Keywords
- phonetic identification, perceptual magnet effect, American English, vowel perception, category boundaries, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Phonetics, Speech Acoustics, Speech Discrimination Tests, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
