Cited by 310Noise Effects and ManagementAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows

Tutorial on sound propagation outdoors

Embleton, Tony F. W.·1996·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Concerns about noise in the community date back to the dawn of recorded history. Then, after centuries of relatively little activity, scientific interest grew during the 17th century and social concerns were again voiced during the 19th century. Many of the wave-propagation mechanisms relevant outdoors were understood at least qualitatively by the late 1800s. Today, knowledge of sound propagation phenomena is of great economic and social importance because of environmental and other concerns. Reality is more complicated than geometrical spreading above flat ground. Some grounds are acoustically hard like concrete, and others soft as snow. Corresponding reflection coefficients are complex and vary with angle. Grounds may not be flat, leading to shadow zones or alternatively multiple reflections at the ground. Gradients of wind or temperature refract waves either upwards (upwind or in a temperature lapse) or downwards (downwind or in a temperature inversion). Atmospheric turbulence causes fluctuations in the acoustical effects. Many of these features mutually interact. Measured sound pressure levels owe as much to near-surface weather and to ground shape and impedance as to acoustical factors such as source and receiver heights and their separation. This tutorial paper emphasizes field measurements and simple physical interpretations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.415879

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The major features of the paper's transmission loss curves are consistent with measured curves and models from previous acoustic studies of sound propagation close to the ground.

    “The major features of our transmission loss curves (Figs 4, 5) are consistent with the measured curves and models of previous acoustic studies of sound propagation close to the ground (Embleton, 1996; Embleton et al., 1976, 1983).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Embleton, T. F. W.
Affiliations
80 Sheardown Drive, Box 786, Nobleton, Ontario L0G 1N0, Canada
Corresponding author
Embleton, Tony F. W.
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1996-07-01
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
31-48
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2057468008
Cited by
310
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
FWCI
30.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Keywords
outdoor sound propagation, ground effect, ground impedance, shadow zone, atmospheric refraction, wind gradients, temperature inversion, atmospheric turbulence, sound pressure level, field measurements, community noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review