Cited by 7Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music Perception

Dynamic cortical imaging of speech compensation for auditory feedback perturbations

Houde, John, Nagarajan, Srikantan, Heinks-Maldonado, Theda·2007·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Understanding how auditory feedback is processed and used during speech production is a long-standing issue, one that has classically been investigated by looking at how altering auditory feedback affects speech. Recently, the advent of functional neuroimaging methods has also allowed examination of how producing speech affects the neural processes serving auditory perception. Here, whole-head magnetic source imaging (MSI) was used to monitor cortical activity as speakers responded to brief perturbations of the pitch or amplitude of their speech. Prior studies have shown that such perturbations cause compensatory responses in speech motor output. MSI recordings were acquired at the onset of feedback perturbations as the subject continuously vocalized and also when the subject passively listened to recordings of the perturbed feedback. A response to the perturbations was found around auditory cortex between 100 and 400 ms postperturbation that was enhanced while subjects vocalized, as compared to when they passively listened. The size of this response enhancement was a significant predictor of how much a subject compensated for the feedback perturbation. Time-frequency optimized adaptive spatial filtering was also used to localize cortical activations that correlated significantly with degree of compensation across subjects. [Work supported by NSF grant BCS-0349582 and NIH/NIDCD grant R01-DC006435.]

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.4781744

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houde, J., Nagarajan, S., & Heinks-Maldonado, T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Depts. of Otolaryngol. and Radiol., Univ. of California, 513 Parnassus Ave., HSE800, San Francisco, CA 94143
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
121
Issue
5_Supplement
Pages
3045-3045
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2033303000
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
auditory feedback perturbation, auditory cortex, speech motor control, pitch perturbation, shimmer, vocalizations, passive listening, cortical activation, adaptive spatial filtering, time-frequency analysis, speech production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review