Speech target modulates speaking induced suppression in auditory cortex
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Previous magnetoencephalography (MEG) studies have demonstrated speaking-induced suppression (SIS) in the auditory cortex during vocalization tasks wherein the M100 response to a subject's own speaking is reduced compared to the response when they hear playback of their speech. RESULTS: The present MEG study investigated the effects of utterance rapidity and complexity on SIS: The greatest difference between speak and listen M100 amplitudes (i.e., most SIS) was found in the simple speech task. As the utterances became more rapid and complex, SIS was significantly reduced (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: These findings are highly consistent with our model of how auditory feedback is processed during speaking, where incoming feedback is compared with an efference-copy derived prediction of expected feedback. Thus, the results provide further insights about how speech motor output is controlled, as well as the computational role of auditory cortex in transforming auditory feedback.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Activation related to processing the sound of the speaker's own voice is less during speech production than when hearing a recording of the spoken response.
“In the bilateral superior temporal gyri associated with auditory processing, further studies showed that activation related to processing the sound of the speaker's own voice was less during the process of producing the speech than when hearing a recording of the spoken response (Ventura et al., 2009; Christoffels et al., 2011).”
From A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012) · cites this paper as Ventura et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751 · see citing works
An internal model for sensorimotor integration
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7569931 · Cited by 3,553 · see citing works
Computational principles of movement neuroscience
Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/81497 · Cited by 2,122 · see citing works
Modulation of the Auditory Cortex during Speech: An MEG Study
Houde, J. F., Nagarajan, S. S., Sekihara, K., & Merzenich, M. M. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892902760807140 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Self-citationStuttered and fluent speech production: An ALE meta‐analysis of functional neuroimaging studies
Brown, S., Ingham, R. J., Ingham, J. C., Laird, A. R., & Fox, P. T. (2005) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20140 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
BRF (1976) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-197608000-00021 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production
Heinks‐Maldonado, T. H., Mathalon, D. H., Gray, M., & Ford, J. M. (2005) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00272.x · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Relationship of imprecise corollary discharge in schizophrenia to auditory hallucinations
Heinks-Maldonado, T. H., Mathalon, D. H., Houde, J. F., Gray, M., Faustman, W. O., & Ford, J. M. (2007) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.3.286 · Cited by 227 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The SIS paradigm used in this study may benefit the study of disorders such as schizophrenia, in which patients lack the ability to distinguish between internally and externally produced speech sounds [15].”
Self-citationMagnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production
Heinks-Maldonado, T. H., Nagarajan, S. S., & Houde, J. F. (2006) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000233102.43526.e9 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Self-citationMagnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli
Eulitz, C., Diesch, E., Pantev, C., et al. (1995) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-04-02748.1995 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Dynamics of Auditory–Vocal Interaction in Monkey Auditory Cortex
Eliades, S. J., & Wang, X. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi030 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Auditory M100 component 1: relationship to Heschl's gyri
Reite, M. L., Adams, M., Simon, J. H., Teale, P. D., Sheeder, J. L., Richardson, D., & Grabbe, R. (1994) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(94)90016-7 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Cortical processing mechanism for vocalization with auditory verbal feedback
Hirano, S., Kojima, H., Naito, Y., Honjo, I., Kamoto, Y., Okazawa, H., Ishizu, K., Yonekura, Y., Nagahama, Y., Fukuyama, H., et al. (1997) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199707070-00055 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Right rolandic activation during speech perception in stutterers: a MEG study
Biermann‐Ruben, K., Salmelin, R. H., & Schnitzler, A. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.024 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Left-hemisphere dominance for processing of vowels
Gootjes, L., Raij, T., Salmelin, R. H., et al. (1999) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199909290-00021 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Sekihara, K., Nagarajan, S. S., Poeppel, D., & Marantz, A. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2003.820329 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationOshino, S., Kato, A., Wakayama, A., Taniguchi, M., Hirata, M., & Yoshimine, T. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.054 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Correlates of eye blinking as determined by synthetic aperture magnetometry
Bardouille, T., Picton, T. W., & Ross, B. (2006) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.021 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Auditory response following vocalization: a magnetoencephalographic study
Gunji, A., Hoshiyama, M., & Kakigi, R. (2001) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00462-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Voluntary stuttering suppresses true stuttering: A window on the speech perception-production link
Saltuklaroglu, T., Kalinowski, J. S., Dayalu, V. N., et al. (2004) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03194876 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Dynamic cortical imaging of speech compensation for auditory feedback perturbations
Houde, J., Nagarajan, S., & Heinks-Maldonado, T. (2007) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4781744 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationLocalization of the human language cortex by magnetic source imaging.
Sun, J., Wu, J., Li, S., et al. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Curio (2000) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(200004)9:4
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Price, C. J. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062 · Cited by 2,159 · see citing works
Computational neuroanatomy of speech production
Hickok, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3158 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Speech Production as State Feedback Control
Houde, J. F., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2011) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00082 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Self-citationMental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models
Tian, X. (2010) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00166 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Sensory-motor networks involved in speech production and motor control: an fMRI study
Behroozmand, R., Shebek, R., Hansen, D. R., Oya, H., Robin, D. A., Howard, M. A., & Greenlee, J. D. W. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.040 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00314 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Modeling the Role of Sensory Feedback in Speech Motor Control and Learning
Parrell, B., & Houde, J. (2019) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-csmc7-18-0127 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationA comparison of sensory-motor activity during speech in first and second languages
Simmonds, A. J., Wise, R. J. S., Dhanjal, N. S., & Leech, R. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00343.2011 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Two tongues, one brain: imaging bilingual speech production
Simmonds, A. J., Wise, R. J. S., & Leech, R. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00166 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Ylinen, S., Nora, A., Leminen, A., Hakala, T., Huotilainen, M., Shtyrov, Y., Mäkelä, J. P., & Service, E. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht351 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ventura, M. I., Nagarajan, S. S., & Houde, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Houde, John F
- Venue
- BMC Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-06-13
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-58
- ISSN
- 1471-2202 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2703647
- OpenAlex
- W2166930968
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BMC Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC006435, R01DC004855)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- auditory cortex, auditory feedback, efference copy, utterance complexity, speech motor control, self-produced speech, speech perception
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Cortex, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Feedback, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Male, Spectrum Analysis, Speech, Speech Perception, Voice, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
