Cited by 5Phonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music PerceptionSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

F0 range instead of F0 slope is the primary cue for the falling tone of Mandarin

Zhang, Wei, Gu, Wentao·2023·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

It has been well known that rising/falling pitch is employed to distinguish the rising (R) or falling (F) tones from the high-level (H) tone in Mandarin, but whether F0 range or F0 slope is the more critical F0 cue to perception is still inconclusive. To clarify this issue quantitatively, we took the F tone as the test case, and conducted two-alternative forced choice identification tests on two types of two-dimensional high-level–falling (H-F) tonal continua, one of which was manipulated along F0 range and duration (“F0 range continuum”) while the other along F0 slope and duration (“F0 slope continuum”). Experimental results indicated that F0 range was the primary cue because it resulted in a more robust (less duration-dependent) perceptual boundary than F0 slope. Meanwhile, the perceptual boundary in F0 range was not fully independent of but mildly modulated by duration, suggesting that duration (or equivalently, F0 slope) played a supplementary role in identifying the H-F tonal contrast.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/10.0019712

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 5

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 1968, A Grammar of Spoken Chinese
  2. 2016, Context effect in the categorical perception of Mandarin tones, J. Sign. Process. Syst., 82, 253, 10.1007/s11265-015-1008-2 · DOI
  3. 2017, Effects of stimulus duration and vowel quality in cross-linguistic categorical perception of pitch directions, PLoS One, 12, e0180656, 10.1371/journal.pone.0180656 · DOI
  4. 2017, The phonetic specification of contour tones: Evidence from the Mandarin rising tone, Phonology, 34, 1, 10.1017/S0952675717000021 · DOI
  5. 1983, Tone perception in Far Eastern languages, J. Phon., 11, 149, 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30813-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 1982, Categorical results do not imply categorical perception, Percept. Psychophys., 32, 409, 10.3758/BF03202770 · DOI
  7. 1976, Acoustical Studies of Mandarin Vowels and Tones
  8. 1985, Variable norms of tones in Beijing prosody, CLAO, 14, 153, 10.3406/clao.1985.1174 · DOI
  9. 1984, Declination: A review and some hypotheses, Phonology, 1, 53, 10.1017/S0952675700000294 · DOI
  10. 1957, The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries, J. Exp. Psychol., 54, 358, 10.1037/h0044417 · DOI
  11. 1988, Putonghua shengdiao de shengxue texing he zhijue zhengzhao” (“Perceptual cues for tones in Standard Chinese, Zhongguo Yuwen (Chin. Language), 204, 182
  12. 2022, The myth of categorical perception, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 152, 3819, 10.1121/10.0016614 · DOI
  13. 2010, The influence of language experience on categorical perception of pitch contours, J. Phon., 38, 616, 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.09.003 · DOI
  14. 1974, Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 55, 328, 10.1121/1.1914506 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2003, The end of categorical perception as we know it, Speech Commun., 41, 71, 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00094-8 · DOI
  16. Stockton, Y. H. (2008). “ The effects of speaking rate on Mandarin tones,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
  17. 2020, Characterizing the distinctive acoustic cues of Mandarin tones, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 147, 2570, 10.1121/10.0001024 · DOI
  18. 2021, Prosodylab Experimenter [JavaScript]
  19. 1976, Language change, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 280, 61, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25472.x · DOI
  20. 1997, Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin, J. Phon., 25, 61, 10.1006/jpho.1996.0034 · DOI
  21. 2006, Effects of language experience and stimulus complexity on the categorical perception of pitch direction, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 120, 1063, 10.1121/1.2213572 · DOI
  22. 1989, Yuanyin he shengdiao zhijue” (“The vowels and the perception of Chinese tones”), ACTA Psychol. Sin., 21, 29
  23. 2016, Diaoyu shichang dui eryu xuexi zhe hanyu shengdiao ganzhi de yingxiang, Hanyu Xuexi, 2016, 83

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, W., & Gu, W.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Nanjing Normal University (CN)
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2023-06-01
Volume
153
Issue
6
Pages
3439
ISSN
0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381849915
Cited by
5
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Social Science Fund of China (13&ZD189)
  • China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
Mandarin tone perception, falling tone, pitch contour, perceptual boundaries, duration effects, tone recognition
MeSH terms
Cues, Language, Pitch Perception, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: F0 range instead of F0 slope is the primary cue for the falling tone of Mandarin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/10.0019712
The paper
Zhang, W., & Gu, W. (2023). F0 range instead of F0 slope is the primary cue for the falling tone of Mandarin. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0019712