Cited by 101Doping in SportsPharmacological Effects and AssaysPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Doping Through Supplement Use: A Review of the Available Empirical Data

Outram, Simon, Stewart, Bob·2015·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

The potential for supplement use to result in doping infringements is likely to be of concern for anyone involved in sports nutrition. The available data indicates that between 40–70% of athletes use supplements, and that between 10–15% of supplements may contain prohibited substances. Such data indicates that there is a considerable risk of accidental or inadvertent doping through using supplements. Accordingly, this paper sets out to provide an overview of the currently available empirical evidence of accidental doping by supplement use. In carrying out this task, the authors refer to press releases and proxy measures associated with nutritional supplement use, as well as statistical data on supplement contamination rates and doping infractions. A number of different indications as to the percentage of doping cases that might be attributed to supplement use are presented, ranging from 6.4% to 8.8%. Such percentages are not comparable; instead they are provided as indications as to how difficult it is to ascertain or estimate the scale of this problem. Although some forms of estimation can be made, it is suggested that it is currently not possible to quantify the scale of the problem. By way of conclusion, it is argued that antidoping regulators may wish to review current data gathering and information provision systems so that the problem of inadvertent doping can be more directly assessed as a factor in sports doping overall.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0174

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Outram, S., & Stewart, B.
Affiliations
Victoria University (AU)
Corresponding author
Outram, Simon
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2015-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
54-59
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2114251728
Cited by
100
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
29.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
dietary supplements, doping, prohibited substances, supplement contamination, sports nutrition, athletes
MeSH terms
Doping in Sports, Food Contamination, Humans, International Agencies, Databases, Factual, Guidelines as Topic, Dietary Supplements, Internet, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review