The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dietary Microperiodization in Elite Female and Male Runners and Race Walkers During a Block of High Intensity Precompetition Training
Abstract
We investigated one week of dietary microperiodization in elite female (n = 23) and male (n = 15) runners and race-walkers by examining the frequency of training sessions and recovery periods conducted with recommended carbohydrate (CHO) and protein availability. Food and training diaries were recorded in relation to HARD (intense or >90min sessions; KEY) versus RECOVERY days (other-than KEY sessions; EASY). The targets for amount and timing of CHO and protein around KEY sessions were based on current nutrition recommendations. Relative daily energy and CHO intake was significantly (p < .05) higher in males (224 ± 26 kJ/kg/d, 7.3 ± 1.4 g/kg/d CHO) than females (204 ± 29 kJ/kg/d, 6.2 ± 1.1 g/kg/d CHO) on HARD days. However, when adjusted for training volume (km), there was no sex-based difference in CHO intake daily (HARD: 0.42 ± 0.14 vs 0.39 ± 0.15 g/kg/km). Females appeared to periodize energy and protein intake with greater intakes on HARD training days (204 ± 29 vs 187 ± 35 kJ/kg/d, p = .004; 2.0 ± 0.3 vs 1.9 ± 0.3 g/kg/d protein, p = .013), while males did not periodize intakes. Females showed a pattern of periodization of postexercise CHO for KEY vs EASY (0.9 ± 0.4 vs 0.5 ± 0.3 g/kg; p < .05) while males had higher intakes but only modest periodization (1.3 ± 0.9 vs 1.0 ± 0.4; p = .32). There was only modest evidence from female athletes of systematic microperiodization of eating patterns to meet contemporary sports nutrition guidelines. While this pattern of periodization was absent in males, in general they consumed more energy and CHO daily and around training sessions compared with females. Elite endurance athletes do not seem to systematically follow the most recent sports nutrition guidelines of periodized nutrition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“many of the recent papers refer to both sexes (Heikura et al., 2017) and non-sex-specified athletes (Burkhart & Pelly, 2016) or relate to a specific subpopulation of female exercisers (e.g., female college athletes; Shriver et al., 2013) or a single female competing in a 1-day event (Moran et al., 2011).”
From Nutrition for Special Populations: Young, Female, and Masters Athletes (2019) · cites this paper as Heikura et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Indeed, previous research on endurance athletes has observed discrepancies between participant reported dietary trends and actual intake [59,60].”
From Fueling for and recovering from resistance training: The periworkout nutrition practices of competitive powerlifters (2024) · cites this paper as [59]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nutrition for Special Populations: Young, Female, and Masters Athletes
Desbrow, B., Burd, N. A., Tarnopolsky, M., Moore, D. R., & Elliott-Sale, K. J. (2019) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism · doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0269 · Cited by 100
Heikura, I. A., Burke, L. M., Bergland, D., Uusitalo, A. L. T., Mero, A. A., & Stellingwerff, T. (2018) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.2017-0547 · Cited by 61
Self-citationNutritional Intake and Energy Availability of Collegiate Distance Runners
Beermann, B. L., Lee, D. G., Almstedt, H. C., & McCormack, W. P. (2020) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2020.1735570 · Cited by 58
Self-reported periodization of nutrition in elite female and male runners and race walkers
Heikura, I. A., Stellingwerff, T., & Burke, L. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01732 · Cited by 40
Self-citationKing, A., Kwan, K., Jukic, I., Zinn, C., & Helms, E. (2024) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2024.112389 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Heikura, I. A., Burke, L. M., Mero, A. A., Uusitalo, A. L. T., & Stellingwerff, T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 297-304
- ISSN
- 1526-484X
- 1543-2742
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.