Variability of PlayerLoad, Bowling Velocity, and Performance Execution in Fast Bowlers Across Repeated Bowling Spells
Abstract
Purpose: The use of wearable microtechnology to monitor the external load of fast bowling is challenged by the inherent variability of bowling techniques between bowlers. This study assessed the between-bowlers variability in PlayerLoad, bowling velocity, and performance execution across repeated bowling spells. Methods: Seven national-level fast bowlers completed two 6-over bowling spells at a batter during a competitive training session. Key dependent variables were PlayerLoad calculated with a MinimaxX microtechnology unit, ball velocity, and bowling execution based on a predetermined bowling strategy for each ball bowled. The between-bowlers coefficient of variation (CV), repeated-measures ANOVA, and smallest worthwhile change were calculated over the 2 repeated 6-over bowling spells and explored across 12-over, 6-over, and 3-over bowling segments. Results: From the sum of 6 consecutive balls, the between-bowlers CV for relative peak PlayerLoad was 1.2% over the 12-over bowling spell ( P = .15). During this 12-over period, bowling-execution ( P = .43) scores and ball-velocity ( P = .31) CVs were calculated as 46.0% and 0.4%, respectively. Conclusions: PlayerLoad was found to be stable across the repeated bowling spells in the fast-bowling cohort. Measures of variability and change across the repeated bowling spells were consistent with the performance measure of ball velocity. The stability of PlayerLoad improved when assessed relative to the individual’s peak PlayerLoad. Only bowling-execution measures were found to have high variability across the repeated bowling spells. PlayerLoad provides a stable measure of external workload between fast bowlers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Accelerometer-derived PlayerLoadTM has demonstrated sensitivity and low variability (<7% CV) in detecting changes following fast bowling spells of differing durations.
“Recent research, has demonstrated the sensitivity and low variability (<7% CV) of accelerometer-derived PlayerLoad™ in detecting changes following fast bowling spells of differing durations [31].”
From Creatine kinase and neuromuscular fatigue responses following differing spells of simulated cricket fast bowling (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Bowling workload plays a crucial role in determining the likelihood of injury.
“Bowling workload plays a crucial role in determining the likelihood of injury [31, 32].”
From Creatine kinase and neuromuscular fatigue responses following differing spells of simulated cricket fast bowling (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Accelerometers offer a stable measure of external quantification.
“offer a stable measure of external quantification [31]”
From Creatine kinase and neuromuscular fatigue responses following differing spells of simulated cricket fast bowling (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Movement patterns in cricket vary by both position and game format.
Petersen, C. J., Pyne, D., Dawson, B., Portus, M., & Kellett, A. (2010) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410903348665 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
McNamara, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., Chapman, P., Naughton, G., & Farhart, P. (2015) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.2014-0062 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McNamara, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., Blanch, P., & Kelly, L. (2018) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.2016-0540 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationBray, J. W., Towlson, C., Hayes, S. C., & Fogarty, M. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317692 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- McNamara, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., Chapman, P., Naughton, G., & Farhart, P.
- Affiliations
- Australian Catholic University (AU)
- Venue
- International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1009-1014
- ISSN
- 1555-0265 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-0273
- OpenAlex
- W2127830019
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- fast bowling, player load, wearable sensors, external load, ball speed, crickets, smallest worthwhile change
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Competitive Behavior, Humans, Physical Education and Training, Sports, Task Performance and Analysis, Geographic Information Systems, Athletic Performance, Young Adult, Accelerometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review