Cited by 23Sports Performance and TrainingSports Dynamics and BiomechanicsSports injuries and prevention

The Relationship Between Variables in Wearable Microtechnology Devices and Cricket Fast-Bowling Intensity.

Open access
McNamara, Dean J., Gabbett, Tim J., Blanch, Peter, Kelly, Luke·2018·International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Abstract

To date, the monitoring of fast-bowling workloads across training and competition environments has been limited to counting total balls bowled. However, bowling at faster velocities is likely to require greater effort while also placing greater load on the bowler. This study investigated the relationship between prescribed effort and microtechnology outputs in fast bowlers to ascertain whether the technology could provide a more refined measure of workload. Twelve high-performing fast bowlers (mean ± SD age 20.3 ± 2.2 y) participated in the study. Each bowler bowled 6 balls at prescribed bowling intensities of 60%, 70%, 85%, and 100%. The relationships between microtechnology outputs, prescribed intensity, and ball velocity were determined using polynomial regression. Very large relationships were observed between prescribed effort and ball velocity for peak PlayerLoad™ (R = .83 ± .19 and .82 ± .20). The PlayerLoad across lower ranges of prescribed effort exhibited a higher coefficient of variation (CV) (60% = 19.0% [17.0-23.0%]), while the CV at higher ranges of prescribed effort was lower (100% = 7.3% [6.4-8.5%]). Routinely used wearable microtechnology devices offer opportunities to examine workload and intensity in cricket fast bowlers outside the normal metrics reported. They offer a useful tool for prescribing and monitoring bowling intensity and workload in elite fast bowlers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0540

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]15. "The Relationship Between Wearable Microtechnology Device Variables and Cricket Fast Bowling Intensity" by McNamara DJ, Gabbett TJ, Blanch P, Kelly L International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance © 2017 Human Kinetics, Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNamara, D. J., Gabbett, T. J., Blanch, P., & Kelly, L.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Published
2018-02
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
135-139
ISSN
  • 1555-0265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-0273
OpenAlex
W2612661119
Cited by
23
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
Keywords
cricket fast bowling, player load, ball speed, training load prescription
MeSH terms
Biomechanical Phenomena, Humans, Sports, Geographic Information Systems, Microtechnology, Young Adult, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review