Cited by 64Sports Performance and TrainingCoffee research and impactsMuscle metabolism and nutrition

The Effects of Caffeine, Taurine, or Caffeine-Taurine Coingestion on Repeat-Sprint Cycling Performance and Physiological Responses

Open access
Warnock, Rory, Jeffries, Owen, Patterson, Stephen, Waldron, Mark·2017·International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Abstract

Purpose:To investigate the effects of caffeine (C), taurine (T), caffeine and taurine coingestion (C +T), or placebo (P) on repeated Wingate cycling performance and associated physiological responses.Methods:Seven male team-sport players participated in a randomized, single-blind, crossover study, where they completed 3 Wingate tests, each separated by 2 min, an hour after ingesting: C (5 mg/kg body mass [BM]), T (50 mg/kg BM), C +T (5 mg/kg BM + 50 mg/kg BM), or P (5 mg/kg BM) in a gelatin capsule. Performance was measured on an ergometer, and blood lactate, perceived exertion, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and rate pressure product (RPP) were measured at rest (presupplement), baseline (1 h postsupplement), and during and after exercise.Results:Magnitude-based inferences revealed that all of the supplements increased (small to moderate, likely to very likely) mean peak power (MPP), peak power (PP), and mean power (MP) compared to P, with greater MPP, PP, and MP in T compared to C (small, possible). Intrasprint fatigue index (%FI Intra) was greater in T compared to P and C (moderate, likely), and %FI Inter was lower in T compared to C (small, possible). C and C +T increased HR, MAP, and RPP compared to P and T at baseline (moderate to very large, likely to most likely); however, these only remained higher in C compared to all conditions in the final sprint.Conclusions:T elicited greater improvements in performance compared to P, C, or C +T while reducing the typical chronotropic and pressor effects of C.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0570

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 50 mg/kg dose of taurine outperformed caffeine, placebo and caffeine + taurine on performance changes after repeated Wingate anaerobic capacity tests.

    “Warnock et al. [630] reported that a 50 mg/kg dose of taurine outperformed caffeine, placebo and caffeine + taurine on performance changes after repeated Wingate anaerobic capacity tests.”

    From ISSN exercise & sports nutrition review update: research & recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [630]

    The Methods and Discussion report a 50 mg/kg taurine condition in repeated Wingate tests and greater power output than placebo. The Discussion describes its advantage over caffeine as only “possibly greater,” while the Results call some taurine–caffeine-plus-taurine differences unclear. The claim overstates the certainty of taurine outperforming every comparator. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warnock, R., Jeffries, O., Patterson, S., & Waldron, M.
Affiliations
  • St Mary's University Twickenham London (GB)
  • University of New England (AU)
Corresponding author
Waldron, Mark
Venue
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Published
2017-11-01
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
1341-1347
ISSN
  • 1555-0265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-0273
OpenAlex
W2603096308
Cited by
64
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St Mary's University Repository (ULCC) (acceptedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
caffeine, taurine, Wingate test, peak power, chronotropic response, pressor response, rate-pressure product, blood lactate, perceived exertion, team sport athletes, ergogenic aids
MeSH terms
Bicycling, Blood Pressure, Caffeine, Exercise Test, Physical Exertion, Heart Rate, Humans, Taurine, Single-Blind Method, Ergometry, Cross-Over Studies, Athletic Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review