Cited by 38Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing Education

Effects of ready for recess, an environmental intervention, on physical activity in third- through sixth-grade children

Huberty, Jennifer L., Beets, Michael W., Beighle, Aaron, Saint-Maurice, Pedro F., Welk, Greg·2014·Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of Ready for Recess, an elementary school recess intervention targeting staff training (ST) or providing recreational equipment (EQ) separately, and the combination (EQ+ST) on physical activity (PA). METHODS: Participants were children attending 1 of 12 elementary schools (grades 3rd-6th) included in the study. Separate analytical models were used to evaluate the effects of the intervention conditions on children's accelerometry and direct observation derived PA measures. RESULTS: Boys and girls were measured using accelerometry (n = 667). Boys in EQ+ST increased their MVPA by 14.1% while ST decreased their MVPA by -13.5%. Girls in ST decreased their MVPA by -11.4%. Neither boys nor girls in EQ increased their time spent in MVPA. A total of 523 (boys) and 559 (girls) observations were collected. For boys' and girls' sedentary and vigorous activity there were no significant main effects for treatment condition, time, or treatment condition-by-time effects. CONCLUSIONS: Environmental modifications are only as strong as the staff that implements them. Supervision, if not interactive, may be detrimental to PA participation, especially in girls. Research related to staff training for encouragement and promotion of PA coupled with appropriate use of equipment during recess is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jpah.2012-0061

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huberty, J. L., Beets, M. W., Beighle, A., Saint-Maurice, P. F., & Welk, G.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Published
2014-02
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
384-395
ISSN
  • 1543-3080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5474
OpenAlex
W2169418825
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Physical Activity and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
elementary school students, physical activity, employee training, recreational equipment, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sedentary behavior, gender differences, environmental interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Environment, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Play and Playthings, Recreation, Schools, United States, Urban Population, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Community-Based Participatory Research, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review