Cited by 87Human-Animal Interaction StudiesPhysical Activity and HealthUrban Transport and Accessibility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Walking the Dog: Is Pet Ownership Associated With Physical Activity in California?

Yabroff, K. Robin, Troiano, Richard P., Berrigan, David·2008·Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Abstract

Background: Several studies have reported positive associations between pet ownership and a variety of health outcomes. In this study, we explored associations between pet ownership and physical activity in a large, ethnically diverse population-based sample in California. Method: Data from the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) were used to assess the associations between pet ownership (ie, dog, dog and cat, cat, and non–pet owners) and transportation and leisure walking in a sample of 41,514 adults. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between pet ownership and type of walking, and linear regression was used to assess associations between pet ownership and total minutes walking per week. Results: Dog owners were slightly less likely to walk for transportation than were non–pet owners (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.99) but more likely to walk for leisure than non–pet owners (OR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.5 to 1.8) in multivariate analyses. Overall, dog owners walked 18.9 (95% CI: 11.4 to 26.4) minutes more per week than non–pet owners. Walking behaviors of cat owners were similar to non–pet owners. Conclusion: Our findings support the moderate association between dog ownership and higher levels of physical activity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jpah.5.2.216

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the California Health Interview Survey comprising more than 55,000 individuals, dog owners more commonly walked as a leisure time activity than those who did not own a pet (O.R. 1.6; 95% CI 1.5-1.8) but were less likely to walk for transportation (O.R. 0.91; 95% CI .85-.99).

    “dog owners more commonly walked as a leisure time activity than those who did not own a pet (O.R. 1.6; 95% CI 1.5–1.8) but were less likely to walk for transportation (O.R. 0.91; 95% CI .85–.99) [45].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yabroff, K. R., Troiano, R. P., & Berrigan, D.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Published
2008-03
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
216-228
ISSN
  • 1543-3080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5474
OpenAlex
W2103230943
Cited by
87
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Physical Activity and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
pet ownership, dog ownership, cat ownership, physical activity, walking, walking for transportation, recreational walking, adults, California Health Interview Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Animals, Animals, Domestic, California, Cats, Dogs, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Exercise, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review