Cited by 317Human-Animal Interaction StudiesPhysical Activity and HealthUrban Transport and Accessibility

Dog ownership and physical activity: a review of the evidence.

Open access
Christian, Hayley E., Westgarth, Carri, Bauman, Adrian, Richards, Elizabeth A., Rhodes, Ryan E., Evenson, Kelly R., Mayer, Joni A., Thorpe, Roland J.·2013·Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dog walking is a strategy for increasing population levels of physical activity (PA). Numerous cross-sectional studies of the relationship between dog ownership and PA have been conducted. The purpose was to review studies comparing PA of dog owners (DO) to nondog owners (NDO), summarize the prevalence of dog walking, and provide recommendations for research. METHODS: A review of published studies (1990-2010) examining DO and NDO PA and the prevalence of dog walking was conducted (N = 29). Studies estimating the relationship between dog ownership and PA were grouped to create a point- estimate using meta-analysis. RESULTS: Most studies were conducted in the last 5 years, were cross-sectional, and sampled adults from Australia or the United States. Approximately 60% of DO walked their dog, with a median duration and frequency of 160 minutes/week and 4 walks/week, respectively. Meta-analysis showed DO engage in more walking and PA than NDO and the effect sizes are small to moderate (d = 0.26 and d = 0.16, respectively). Three studies provided evidence of a directional relationship between dog ownership and walking. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal and interventional studies would provide stronger causal evidence for the relationship between dog ownership and PA. Improved knowledge of factors associated with dog walking will guide intervention research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jpah.10.5.750

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Katcher AH. Physiologic and behavioural responses to companion animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Prac. 1985;152:403-410.
  2. Conner M, Norman P. Predicting Health Behaviour: A Social Cognition Approach. In: Conner M, Ed. Predicting Health Behaviour. 2nd ed. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education; 2005:1-21.
  3. Marmot M. Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review Executive Summary: The Marmot Review; 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christian, H. E., Westgarth, C., Bauman, A., Richards, E. A., Rhodes, R. E., Evenson, K. R., Mayer, J. A., & Thorpe, R. J.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Published
2013-07
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
750-759
ISSN
  • 1543-3080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5474
OpenAlex
W2167476990
Cited by
316
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physical Activity and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (458668)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
dog ownership, dog walking, physical activity, walking, pet ownership, physical activity interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Australia, Dogs, Humans, Middle Aged, Recreation, United States, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Exercise, Prevalence, Walking, Pets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review