Cited by 62Physical Activity and HealthUrban Transport and AccessibilityUrban Green Space and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unleashing Physical Activity: An Observational Study of Park Use, Dog Walking, and Physical Activity

Temple, Viviene, Rhodes, Ryan, Higgins, Joan Wharf·2011·Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Abstract

Background: Walking has been identified as a low resourced yet effective means of achieving physical activity levels required for optimal health. From studies conducted around the world, we know that dog owners walk more than nondog owners. However, this evidence is largely self-reported which may not accurately reflect dog-owners’ behaviors. Method: To address this concern, we systematically observed the use of 6 different public parks in Victoria, British Columbia during fair and inclement weather. Using a modified version of the SOPARC tool, we documented visitors’ types of physical activity, and the presence or absence of dogs. The Physical Activity Resource Assessment was used to consider park features, amenities, and incivilities. Results: More people without dogs (73%) visited the parks than those with dogs (27%), largely because of attendance at the multiuse sport parks during the summer months. Despite the opportunities to engage in multiple sports, most people used the parks to walk. However, when inclement weather struck, dog owners continued visiting parks and sustained their walking practices significantly more than nondog owners. Conclusion: Our observational snapshot of park use supports earlier work that dogs serve as a motivational support for their owners’ walking practices through fair and foul weather.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jpah.8.6.766

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study in Canada, dog owners (including participants up to age 80) were more likely to visit multiuse or walk-through parks than individuals who did not possess dogs.

    “dog owners in Canada (not exclusively elderly, but including participants up to age 80) were more likely to visit multiuse or walk-through parks than individuals who did not possess dogs [40].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Temple, V., Rhodes, R., & Higgins, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Venue
Journal of Physical Activity and Health
Published
2011-08
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
766-774
ISSN
  • 1543-3080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-5474
OpenAlex
W2138121640
Cited by
62
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Physical Activity and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
Keywords
dog walking, park use, physical activity, walking, dog owners, public parks, inclement weather, park amenities, SOPARC, outdoor recreation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Animals, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denmark, Dogs, Environment Design, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Public Facilities, Walking, Young Adult, Pets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review