The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Adolescents’ Positive and Negative Developmental Experiences in Sport
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to gain understanding of adolescents’ positive and negative developmental experiences in sport. Twenty-two purposefully sampled adolescent competitive swimmers participated in a semistructured qualitative interview. Content analysis led to the organization of meaning units into themes and categories (Patton, 2002). Athletes suggested their sport involvement facilitated many positive developmental experiences (i.e., related to challenge, meaningful adult and peer relationships, a sense of community, and other life experiences) and some negative developmental experiences (i.e., related to poor coach relationships, negative peer influences, parent pressure, and the challenging psychological environment of competitive sport). Findings underline the important roles of sport programmers, clubs, coaches, and parents in facilitating youths’ positive developmental experiences in sport, while highlighting numerous important directions for future research. Implications for coach training and practice are outlined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feldman, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075002159 · Cited by 815 · cited 4×
“As such, generalizations to other sport contexts should be done with caution due to substantial differences between programs ( Feldman & Matjasko, 2005 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialA Framework for Planning Youth Sport Programs That Foster Psychosocial Development
Petitpas, A. J., Cornelius, A. E., Van Raalte, J. L., & Jones, T. (2005) · The Sport Psychologist · doi:10.1123/tsp.19.1.63 · Cited by 493
Cited by
Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211413125 · Cited by 1,064
Holt, N. L., Neely, K. C., Slater, L. G., Camiré, M., Côté, J., Fraser-Thomas, J., MacDonald, D., Strachan, L., & Tamminen, K. A. (2017) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2016.1180704 · Cited by 720
“…character and life skills Participant observation Semistructured interviews Thematic analysis Pilot interviews Team approach to analysis Journaling Fraser-Thomas and Côté (2009) To gain an understanding of adolescents’ positive and negative experiences in sport from a developmental perspective…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationWeiss, M. R., Stuntz, C. P., Bhalla, J. A., Bolter, N. D., & Price, M. S. (2013) · Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2012.712997 · Cited by 140
Curran, T., Hill, A. P., & Niemiec, C. P. (2013) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.35.1.30 · Cited by 129
A Case Study of a High School Sport Program Designed to Teach Athletes Life Skills and Values
Camiré, M., Trudel, P., & Bernard, D. (2013) · The Sport Psychologist · doi:10.1123/tsp.27.2.188 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraser-Thomas, J., & Côté, J.
- Venue
- The Sport Psychologist
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-23
- ISSN
- 0888-4781 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2793
- OpenAlex
- W2145202767
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
