Cited by 337Immunotoxicology and immune responsesBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

PEGylated Proteins: Evaluation of Their Safety in the Absence of Definitive Metabolism Studies

Webster, Rob, Didier, Eric, Harris, Philip, Siegel, Ned, Stadler, Jeanne, Tilbury, Lorraine, Smith, Dennis·2007·Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Abstract

During the development of any PEGylated protein or peptide, toxicology in relevant species will be conducted prior to human exposure. Normally, comprehensive metabolism data accompany the toxicity studies for a small molecule. We have examined whether such studies would be relevant in the safety assessment of PEGylated material. Literature data indicate that the polyethylene glycol (PEG) associated with a biological molecule should provide no extra concern because the exposure-toxicity relationship of PEG in animals and humans has been thoroughly investigated and metabolism/excretion of PEG is well understood. Based on the comparisons of PEG exposure from PEGylated biological products and the exposure of PEG associated with toxicity in humans, the therapeutic index is large (approximately 600-fold or greater). Therefore, assuming that toxicological evaluation of a biological molecule of interest is complete and satisfactory therapeutic windows are achieved, the data contained in this review indicate that the PEG associated with a protein or other biological molecule does not represent an additional unquantified risk to humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/dmd.106.012419

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even for quite large polymers (up to ~200 kDa in some cases), urinary excretion can still play a major role.

    “Nonetheless, even for quite large polymers (up to ~200 kDa in some cases), urinary excretion can still play a major role [254].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webster, R., Didier, E., Harris, P., Siegel, N., Stadler, J., Tilbury, L., & Smith, D.
Affiliations
Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
9-16
ISSN
0090-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166171010
Cited by
337
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 20
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
PEGylated proteins, polyethylene glycol, safety assessment, exposure-toxicity relationship, therapeutic window
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Polyethylene Glycols, Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review