Cited by 59Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Nicotine pharmacokinetics in rats is altered as a function of age, impacting the interpretation of animal model data

Open access
Craig, Evelyn L., Zhao, Bin, Cui, Jason Z., Novalen, Maria, Miksys, Sharon, Tyndale, Rachel F.·2014·Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Abstract

Several behavioral studies report that adolescent rats display a preference for nicotine compared with adults. However, age-related pharmacokinetic differences may confound the interpretation of these findings. Thus, differences in pharmacokinetic analyses of nicotine were investigated. Nicotine was administered via acute s.c. (1.0 mg base/kg) or i.v. (0.2 mg base/kg) injection to early adolescent (EA; postnatal day 25) and adult (AD; postnatal day 71) male Wistar rats. Nicotine and its primary metabolite, cotinine, and additional metabolites nornicotine, nicotine-1'-N-oxide, trans-3'-hydroxycotinine, and norcotinine were sampled from 10 minutes to 8 hours (plasma) and 2 to 8 hours (brain) post nicotine and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Following s.c. nicotine, the EA cohort had lower levels of plasma nicotine, cotinine, and nicotine-1'-N-oxide at multiple time points, resulting in a lower area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for nicotine (P < 0.001), cotinine (P < 0.01), and nicotine-1'-N-oxide (P < 0.001). Brain levels were also lower for these compounds. In contrast, the EA cohort had higher plasma and brain AUCs (P < 0.001) for the minor metabolite nornicotine. Brain-to-plasma ratios varied for nicotine and its metabolites, and by age. Following i.v. nicotine administration, similar age-related differences were observed, and this route allowed detection of a 1.6-fold-larger volume of distribution and 2-fold higher plasma clearance in the EA cohort compared with the AD cohort. Thus, unlike in humans, there are substantial age differences in nicotine pharmacokinetics such that for a given nicotine dose, adolescent rats will have lower plasma and brain nicotine compared with adults, suggesting that this should be considered when interpreting animal model data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/dmd.114.058719

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nicotine is metabolized faster in rodents during pre-adolescence (P23-25) than in adults, producing lower blood levels, but no pharmacokinetic differences are seen during the adolescent period starting at P28.

    “Although nicotine is more rapidly metabolized in rodents during pre-adolescence (P23–25) than in adults, leading to lower blood levels, no pharmacokinetic differences have been seen during the adolescent period starting at P28 (Portugal et al., 2012; Ahsan et al., 2014; Craig et al., 2014; Arany et al., 2017).”

    From Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain. (2020) · cites this paper as Craig et al., 2014

    The Abstract and Results report lower plasma nicotine levels and faster nicotine clearance in early-adolescent rats at postnatal day 25 than in adults. The Discussion does not support the more specific claim that faster metabolism caused the lower levels; it points primarily to clearance and distribution and does not find faster conversion to cotinine. The paper compares day-25 rats with adults, so it does not establish that pharmacokinetic differences disappear starting at day 28. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craig, E. L., Zhao, B., Cui, J. Z., Novalen, M., Miksys, S., & Tyndale, R. F.
Affiliations
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Venue
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
42
Issue
9
Pages
1447-1455
ISSN
0090-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119204312
Cited by
59
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP97751)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA020830)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
nicotine pharmacokinetics, age differences, adolescent rats, nicotine metabolism, cotinine, nornicotine, trans-3'-hydroxycotinine, brain-to-plasma ratio, volume of distribution, plasma clearance, nicotine preference
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cotinine, Cyclic N-Oxides, Male, Nicotine, Plasma, Rats, Wistar, Area Under Curve, Models, Animal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review