Cited by 29Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

An Approach to Discovering Novel Muscarinic M1 Receptor Positive Allosteric Modulators with Potent Cognitive Improvement and Minimized Gastrointestinal Dysfunction

Open access
Kurimoto, Emi, Matsuda, Satoru, Shimizu, Yuji, Sako, Yuu, Mandai, Takao, Sugimoto, Takahiro, Sakamoto, Hiroki, Kimura, Haruhide·2018·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

Activation of muscarinic M 1 receptor (M 1 R) is a promising approach for improving cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. However, an M 1 R-selective positive allosteric modulator (PAM), benzyl quinolone carboxylic acid (BQCA), at 30 mg/kg, induced diarrhea in wild-type mice, but not in M 1 R knockout mice. Moreover, BQCA (0.1-1000 nM) augmented electric field stimulation (EFS)-induced ileum contraction in an in vitro Magnus assay. Thus, we decided to establish a drug-screening strategy to discover novel M 1 PAMs producing potent cognitive improvement with minimized gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction. We assessed PAM parameters of various M 1 PAMs with ≥100-fold selectivity over other muscarinic receptor subtypes by using in vitro binding and functional analysis. Evaluation of these M 1 PAMs in the Magnus assay revealed a significant correlation between percentage of ileum contractions at 1 μ M and their α-value, a PAM parameter associated with the binding cooperativity between acetylcholine and M 1 PAM. M 1 PAMs with lower α-value showed lower impact on EFS-induced ileum contraction. Next, we characterized in vivo profiles of two M 1 PAMs: compound A (log α = 1.18) and compound B (log α = 3.30). Compound A, at 30 mg/kg, significantly improved scopolamine-induced cognitive deficits without prominent signs of diarrhea at up to 1000 mg/kg in mice. In contrast, compound B, at 10 mg/kg, showed both significant improvement of scopolamine-induced cognitive deficits and severe diarrhea. Thus, fine adjustment of the α-values could be a key to discovering M 1 PAMs yielding potent cognitive improvement with a lower risk of GI effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/jpet.117.243774

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BQCA and PF06764427 achieve subtype selectivity through allosteric effects but have significant agonistic activity that may lead to side effects like diarrhea.

    “M1-mAChR positive allosteric modulators (M1-PAMs), such as BQCA (53) and PF06764427 (54), achieve subtype selectivity through allosteric effects but have significant agonistic activity that may lead to side effects like diarrhea.544,553”

    From Recent advances in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms, clinical trials and new drug development strategies. (2024) · cites this paper as [553]

    The Results identify BQCA as a highly selective M1 positive allosteric modulator and report diarrhea in treated mice but not M1-receptor knockout mice. The Discussion links the diarrhea to gastrointestinal M1 activation. Our copy does not address PF06764427 or establish that significant intrinsic agonistic activity in either compound causes the side effect. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Belzung C (1999) Measuring rodent exploratory behavior, in Handbook of Molec- ulargenetic Techniques for Brain and Behavior Research (Crusio WE and Gerlai RT, eds) pp 738-749, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurimoto, E., Matsuda, S., Shimizu, Y., Sako, Y., Mandai, T., Sugimoto, T., Sakamoto, H., & Kimura, H.
Affiliations
Takeda (Japan) (JP)
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
364
Issue
1
Pages
28-37
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2761452256
Cited by
29
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
M1 muscarinic receptor, positive allosteric modulators, gastrointestinal dysfunction, diarrhea, ileum contraction, cooperative binding, scopolamine-induced cognitive deficits, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive enhancement, drug screening, muscarinic receptor selectivity
MeSH terms
Allosteric Regulation, Animals, Cognition Disorders, Cricetulus, Diarrhea, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Cricetinae, Humans, Ileum, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred ICR, Organ Culture Techniques, Quinolines, Random Allocation, Structure-Activity Relationship, CHO Cells, Mice, Knockout, Nootropic Agents, Receptor, Muscarinic M1, Mice, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review