Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distinct Functional and Pharmacological Properties of Tonic and Quantal Inhibitory Postsynaptic Currents Mediated by γ-Aminobutyric AcidAReceptors in Hippocampal Neurons

Bai, Donglin, Zhu, Guoyun, Pennefather, Peter, Jackson, Michael F., MacDonald, John F., Orser, Beverley A.·2001·Molecular Pharmacology

Abstract

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA), the principal inhibitory neurotransmitter, activates a persistent low amplitude tonic current in several brain regions in addition to conventional synaptic currents. Here we demonstrate that GABA(A) receptors mediating the tonic current in hippocampal neurons exhibit functional and pharmacological properties different from those of quantal synaptic currents. Patch-clamp techniques were used to characterize miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) and the tonic GABAergic current recorded in CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices and in dissociated neurons grown in culture. The competitive GABA(A) receptor antagonists, bicuculline and picrotoxin, blocked both the mIPSCs and the tonic current. In contrast, mIPSCs but not the tonic current were inhibited by gabazine (SR-95531). Coapplication experiments and computer simulations revealed that gabazine bound to the receptors responsible for the tonic current but did not prevent channel activation. However, gabazine competitively inhibited bicuculline blockade. The unitary conductance of the GABA(A) receptors underlying the tonic current (approximately 6 pS) was less than the main conductance of channels activated during quantal synaptic transmission (approximately 15--30 pS). Furthermore, compounds that potentiate GABA(A) receptor function including the benzodiazepine, midazolam, and anesthetic, propofol, prolonged the duration of mIPSCs and increased tonic current amplitude in cultured neurons to different extents. Clinically-relevant concentrations of midazolam and propofol caused a greater increase in tonic current compared with mIPSCs, as measured by total charge transfer. In summary, the receptors underlying the tonic current are functionally and pharmacologically distinct from quantally activated synaptic receptors and these receptors represent a novel target for neurodepressive drugs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/mol.59.4.814

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Bai, D., Zhu, G., Pennefather, P., Jackson, M. F., MacDonald, J. F., & Orser, B. A.
Venue
Molecular Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04-01
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
814-824
ISSN
  • 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0111
OpenAlex
W1821749400
Cited by
358
References
38
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinct Functional and Pharmacological Properties of Tonic and Quantal Inhibitory Postsynaptic Currents Mediated by γ-Aminobutyric AcidAReceptors in Hippocampal Neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1124/mol.59.4.814
The paper
Bai, D., Zhu, G., Pennefather, P., Jackson, M. F., MacDonald, J. F., & Orser, B. A. (2001). Distinct Functional and Pharmacological Properties of Tonic and Quantal Inhibitory Postsynaptic Currents Mediated by γ-Aminobutyric AcidAReceptors in Hippocampal Neurons. Molecular Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.59.4.814

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.