Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Repeated divergent selection on pigmentation genes in a rapid finch radiation

Open access
Campagna, Leonardo, Repenning, Márcio, Silveira, Luís Fábio, Fontana, Carla Suertegaray, Tubaro, Pablo L., Lovette, Irby J.·2017·Science Advances

Abstract

Selection acted repeatedly on regions that may regulate the expression of genes underlying coloration differences in seedeaters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.1602404

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Campagna, L., Repenning, M., Silveira, L. F., Fontana, C. S., Tubaro, P. L., & Lovette, I. J.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2017-05-05
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
e1602404-e1602404
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2617614970
Cited by
185
References
8
FWCI
17.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repeated divergent selection on pigmentation genes in a rapid finch radiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/sciadv.1602404
The paper
Campagna, L., Repenning, M., Silveira, L. F., Fontana, C. S., Tubaro, P. L., & Lovette, I. J. (2017). Repeated divergent selection on pigmentation genes in a rapid finch radiation. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602404

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.