Cited by 46Heat shock proteins researchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Reactive astrocytes secrete the chaperone HSPB1 to mediate neuroprotection

Open access
Yang, Fangjia, Beltran-Lobo, Paula, Sung, Katherine, Goldrick, Caoimhe, Croft, Cara L., Nishimura, Agnes, Hedges, Erin, Mahiddine, Farah +6 more·2024·Science Advances

Abstract

Molecular chaperones are protective in neurodegenerative diseases by preventing protein misfolding and aggregation, such as extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular tau neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In addition, AD is characterized by an increase in astrocyte reactivity. The chaperone HSPB1 has been proposed as a marker for reactive astrocytes; however, its astrocytic functions in neurodegeneration remain to be elucidated. Here, we identify that HSPB1 is secreted from astrocytes to exert non–cell-autonomous protective functions. We show that in human AD brain, HSPB1 levels increase in astrocytes that cluster around amyloid plaques, as well as in the adjacent extracellular space. Moreover, in conditions that mimic an inflammatory reactive response, astrocytes increase HSPB1 secretion. Concomitantly, astrocytes and neurons can uptake astrocyte-secreted HSPB1, which is accompanied by an attenuation of the inflammatory response in reactive astrocytes and reduced pathological tau inclusions. Our findings highlight a protective mechanism in disease conditions that encompasses the secretion of a chaperone typically regarded as intracellular.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.adk9884

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HSPB1 is a key stress response protein and reactive astrocyte marker that is secreted proximal to amyloid plaques where it exerts non-cell-autonomous neuroprotection through stabilization of proteostasis.

    “Of particular interest was the prominent enrichment of HSPB1, a key stress response protein and reactive astrocyte marker that has recently been shown to be secreted proximal to amyloid plaques where it exerts non-cell-autonomous neuroprotection through the stabilization of proteostasis (60).”

    From Molecular and cellular processes disrupted in the early postnatal Down syndrome prefrontal cortex (2026) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Results report increased extracellular HSPB1 near plaque-associated astrocytes and non-cell-autonomous protection against neuronal injury and tau aggregation. The Discussion proposes that HSPB1 may help maintain neuronal proteostasis, but says its downstream mechanism remains an open question; the claim presents proteostasis stabilization as an established mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, F., Beltran-Lobo, P., Sung, K., Goldrick, C., Croft, C. L., Nishimura, A., Hedges, E., Mahiddine, F., Troakes, C., Golde, T. E., Perez-Nievas, B. G., Hanger, D. P., Noble, W., & Jimenez-Sanchez, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 5 Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RX, UK.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2024-03-22
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
eadk9884-eadk9884
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392982799
Cited by
46
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 6
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • King's College London
  • Medical Research Council (MR/V036947/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
HSPB1, reactive astrocytes, neuroprotection, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, molecular chaperones, neuroinflammation, intercellular protein transfer, protein misfolding
MeSH terms
Neuroprotection, Alzheimer Disease, Astrocytes, Heat-Shock Proteins, Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Molecular Chaperones, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review