The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Substrate recognition by human separase
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The cohesin complex encircles sister chromatids in early mitosis. At anaphase onset, sister separation is triggered by the proteolytic cleavage of the cohesin subunit SCC1/RAD21 by separase. SCC1 contains two cleavage sites, where cleavage is stimulated by SCC1 phosphorylation. Substrate recognition and cleavage are only partly understood. Here, we determined structures of human separase in apo- or substrate-bound forms that, together with biochemical analysis, provide critical insights into separase cleavage regulation. We verify the first SCC1 cleavage site and reassign the second. We show that substrates, including separase autocleavage sites and the two SCC1 cleavage sites, interact with docking sites in separase, including five phosphate-binding sites. We also describe the interaction between the cohesin subunit SA1/SA2 and separase, which promotes cleavage at the second SCC1 site. Using cross-linking mass spectrometry and cryo–electron microscopy, we propose how cohesin is targeted by human separase. Our work provides an extensive functional and structural framework that explains a key event in cell division.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861
Automated model building and protein identification in cryo-EM maps
Jamali, K., Käll, L., Zhang, R., Brown, A., Kimanius, D., & Scheres, S. H. W. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.16.541002 · Cited by 686
The structural basis for cohesin–CTCF-anchored loops
Li, Y., Haarhuis, J. H. I., Sedeño Cacciatore, Á., Oldenkamp, R., van Ruiten, M. S., Willems, L., Teunissen, H., Muir, K. W., de Wit, E., Rowland, B. D., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1910-z · Cited by 459
Regulation of Human Separase by Securin Binding and Autocleavage
Waizenegger, I. C., Giménez-Abián, J. F., Wernic, D., & Peters, J.-M. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01073-4 · Cited by 222
Molecular mechanism of APC/C activation by mitotic phosphorylation
Zhang, S., Chang, L., Alfieri, C., Zhang, Z., Yang, J., Maslen, S., Skehel, M., & Barford, D. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17973 · Cited by 203
Structure of cohesin subcomplex pinpoints direct shugoshin-Wapl antagonism in centromeric cohesion
Hara, K., Zheng, G., Qu, Q., Liu, H., Ouyang, Z., Chen, Z., Tomchick, D. R., & Yu, H. (2014) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2880 · Cited by 166
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00162-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00515-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature07098 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/21831 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00130-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00132-X · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1061376 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03764-0 · DOI
- 10.1042/BST20221400 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03238-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81211-8 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.285.5426.418 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00603-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.022 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.03083 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111723 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M309761200 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature17402 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030069 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-13209-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.06.056 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00362-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600303 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.041 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms10076 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb0901-771 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0069458 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.3386 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature21061 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M702545200 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.00941.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.06.019 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gku1267 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004672 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.040 · DOI
- 10.1177/1087057114520972 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja809315x · DOI
- 10.2144/000112517 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-2847-8_12 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.4169 · DOI · Paper page
- T. G. Martin A. Boland A. W. P. Fitzpatrick S. H. W. Scheres Graphene oxide grid preparation figshare [Preprint] (2016); https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.3178669.V1. · DOI
- 10.1042/BCJ20210708 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-023-39031-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.2727 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-024-07215-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3791 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.15252/msb.20198994 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, J., Schmidt, S., Botto, M., Lee, K., Ghent, C. M., Goodfried, J. M., Howe, A., O’Reilly, F. J., Morgan, D. O., & Boland, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boland, Andreas
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science Advances
- Published
- 2025-11-14
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- eady9807-eady9807
- ISSN
- 2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12609080
- OpenAlex
- W4416203149
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Swiss National Science Foundation (TMSGI3_211581)
- Krebsforschung Schweiz (KFS-5453-08-2021)
- Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research (ZIA BC 012114)
- US National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35-GM118053)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Keywords
- separase, cohesin, sister chromatid separation, anaphase onset, substrate recognition, proteolytic cleavage, cleavage site mapping, docking site, phosphate binding site, mitosis, cell division
- MeSH terms
- Cohesins, Binding Sites, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Models, Molecular, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Substrate Specificity, Cell Cycle Proteins, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Separase
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review