Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lack of Replicative Senescence in Cultured Rat Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells

Tang, Dean G., Tokumoto, Yasuhito M., Apperly, James A., Lloyd, Alison C., Raff, Martin C.·2001·Science

Abstract

Most mammalian somatic cells are thought to have a limited proliferative capacity because they permanently stop dividing after a finite number of divisions in culture, a state termed replicative cell senescence. Here we show that most oligodendrocyte precursor cells purified from postnatal rat optic nerve can proliferate indefinitely in serum-free culture if prevented from differentiating; various cell cycle–inhibitory proteins increase, but the cells do not stop dividing. The cells maintain high telomerase activity and p53- and Rb-dependent cell cycle checkpoint responses, and serum or genotoxic drugs induce them to acquire a senescence-like phenotype. Our findings suggest that some normal rodent precursor cells have an unlimited proliferative capacity if cultured in conditions that avoid both differentiation and the activation of checkpoint responses that arrest the cell cycle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1056780

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90211-9 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/35040500 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/78592 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90305-0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Raff M. C., Durand B., Gao F.-B., Int. J. Dev. Biol. 42, 263 (1998).
  7. 10.1038/319499a0 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1242/dev.105.2.387 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1006/dbio.1998.8877 · DOI
  10. 10.1242/dev.120.5.1097 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1083/jcb.148.5.971 · DOI
  12. Web Fig. 1 and supplementary material are available on Science Online at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/291/5505/864/DC1.
  13. 10.1101/gad.12.19.2984 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1101/gad.12.19.2973 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1101/gad.11.5.663 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1093/nar/18.12.3587 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1101/gad.13.12.1501 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/S0959-437X(98)80060-9 · DOI
  19. 10.1101/gad.12.15.2245 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Ruas M., Peters G., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1378, F115 (1998).
  21. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202918 · DOI
  22. Raff M. C., Miller R. H., Noble M., Nature 303, 396 (1993).
  23. Chang B. D., et al., Cancer Res. 59, 3761 (1999).
  24. 10.1126/science.1056782 · DOI · Paper page
  25. ; published online (19 January 2001) 10.1126/science.1056782. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Tang, D. G., Tokumoto, Y. M., Apperly, J. A., Lloyd, A. C., & Raff, M. C.
Venue
Science
Published
2001-02-02
Volume
291
Issue
5505
Pages
868-871
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1963550744
Cited by
228
References
3
FWCI
20.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lack of Replicative Senescence in Cultured Rat Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1056780
The paper
Tang, D. G., Tokumoto, Y. M., Apperly, J. A., Lloyd, A. C., & Raff, M. C. (2001). Lack of Replicative Senescence in Cultured Rat Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1056780

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.