The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deciphering the Cross-Talk of Implantation: Advances and Challenges
Abstract
Implantation involves a series of steps leading to an effective reciprocal signaling between the blastocyst and the uterus. Except for a restricted period when ovarian hormones induce a uterine receptive phase, the uterus is an unfavorable environment for blastocyst implantation. Because species-specific variations in implantation strategies exist, these differences preclude the formulation of a unifying theme for the molecular basis of this event. However, an increased understanding of mammalian implantation has been gained through the use of the mouse model. This review summarizes recognized signaling cascades and new research in mammalian implantation, based primarily on available genetic and molecular evidence from implantation studies in the mouse. Although the identification of new molecules associated with implantation in various species provides valuable insight, important questions remain regarding the common molecular mechanisms that govern this process. Understanding the mechanisms of implantation promises to help alleviate infertility, enhance fetal health, and improve contraceptive design. The success of any species depends on its reproductive efficiency. For sexual reproduction, an egg and sperm must overcome many obstacles to fuse and co-mingle their genetic material at fertilization. The zygote develops into a blastocyst with two cell lineages (the inner cell mass and the trophectoderm), migrates within the reproductive tract, and ultimately implants into a transiently permissive host tissue, the uterus. However, the molecular basis of the road map connecting the blastocyst with the endometrium across species is diverse (1) and not fully understood. Recent advances have identified numerous molecules involved in implantation (1–4), yet new discoveries have not yielded a unifying scheme for the mechanisms of implantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estrogen Receptor Null Mice: What Have We Learned and Where Will They Lead Us?
Couse, J. F., & Korach, K. S. (1999) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.20.3.0370 · Cited by 2,045
Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor
Stewart, C. L., Kaspar, P., Brunet, L. J., Bhatt, H., Gadi, I., Köntgen, F., & Abbondanzo, S. J. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/359076a0 · Cited by 2,034
Banfield, J. F., Welch, S. A., Zhang, H., Ebert, T. T., & Penn, R. L. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5480.751 · Cited by 1,751
Multiple Female Reproductive Failures in Cyclooxygenase 2–Deficient Mice
Lim, H., Paria, B. C., Das, S. K., Dinchuk, J. E., Langenbach, R., Trzaskos, J. M., & Dey, S. K. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80402-x · Cited by 1,430
Self-citationImplantation and the Survival of Early Pregnancy
Norwitz, E. R., Schust, D. J., & Fisher, S. J. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra000763 · Cited by 1,264
Matrix metalloproteinases: effectors of development and normal physiology
Vu, T. H., & Werb, Z. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.815400 · Cited by 1,235
Time of Implantation of the Conceptus and Loss of Pregnancy
Wilcox, A. J., Baird, D. D., & Weinberg, C. R. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199906103402304 · Cited by 1,081
Reduced fertility and postischaemic brain injury in mice deficient in cytosolic phospholipase A2
Bonventre, J. V., Huang, Z., Taheri, M. R., O'Leary, E., Li, E., Moskowitz, M. A., & Sapirstein, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/37635 · Cited by 845
Subgroup of reproductive functions of progesterone mediated by progesterone receptor-B isoform
Mulac-Jericevic, B., Mullinax, R. A., DeMayo, F. J., Lydon, J. P., & Conneely, O. M. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5485.1751 · Cited by 704
Carson, D. D., Bagchi, I., Dey, S. K., Enders, A. C., Fazleabas, A. T., Lessey, B. A., & Yoshinaga, K. (2000) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.9767 · Cited by 676
Self-citation
Cited by
Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models
Wang, H., & Dey, S. K. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1808 · Cited by 1,298
Self-citationInflammation and pregnancy: the role of the immune system at the implantation site
Mor, G., Cardenas, I., Abrahams, V., & Guller, S. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05938.x · Cited by 1,110
Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation.
Achache, H., & Revel, A. (2006) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml004 · Cited by 952
Trophoblast differentiation during embryo implantation and formation of the maternal-fetal interface
Red-Horse, K., Zhou, Y., Genbacev, O., Prakobphol, A., Foulk, R., McMaster, M., & Fisher, S. J. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci200422991 · Cited by 786
Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation
Zhang, S., Lin, H., Kong, S., Wang, S., Wang, H., Wang, H., & Armant, D. R. (2013) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.011 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Paria, B. C., Reese, J., Das, S. K., & Dey, S. K.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2002-06-21
- Volume
- 296
- Issue
- 5576
- Pages
- 2185-2188
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2072261526
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deciphering the Cross-Talk of Implantation: Advances and Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1071601
- The paper
- Paria, B. C., Reese, J., Das, S. K., & Dey, S. K. (2002). Deciphering the Cross-Talk of Implantation: Advances and Challenges. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1071601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.