The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Separable Roles for rent1/hUpf1 in Altered Splicing and Decay of Nonsense Transcripts
Abstract
The mechanism by which disruption of reading frame can influence pre–messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) processing is poorly understood. We assessed the role of factors essential for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) in nonsense-mediated altered splicing (NAS) with the use of RNA interference (RNAi) in mammalian cells. Inhibition of rent1/hUpf1 expression abrogated both NMD and NAS of nonsense T cell receptor β transcripts. In contrast, inhibition of rent2/hUpf2 expression did not disrupt NAS despite achieving comparable stabilization of nonsense transcripts. We also demonstrate that NAS and NMD are genetically separable functions of rent1/hUpf1. Additionally, rent1/hUpf1 enters the nucleus where it may directly influence early events in mRNA biogenesis. This provides compelling evidence that NAS relies on a component of the nonsense surveillance machinery but is not an indirect consequence of NMD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: exonic mutations that affect splicing
Cartegni, L., Chew, S. L., & Krainer, A. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg775 · Cited by 2,209
Cited by
Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: splicing, translation and mRNP dynamics
Maquat, L. E. (2004) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1310 · Cited by 1,214
Boutz, P. L., Stoilov, P., Li, Q., Lin, C.-H., Chawla, G., Ostrow, K., Shiue, L., Ares, M., & Black, D. L. (2007) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1558107 · Cited by 577
Spellman, R., Llorian, M., & Smith, C. W. J. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.016 · Cited by 313
Llorian, M., Schwartz, S., Clark, T. A., Hollander, D., Tan, L.-Y., Spellman, R., Gordon, A., Schweitzer, A. C., de la Grange, P., Ast, G., et al. (2010) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1881 · Cited by 263
NOVA-dependent regulation of cryptic NMD exons controls synaptic protein levels after seizure
Eom, T., Zhang, C., Wang, H., Lay, K., Fak, J., Noebels, J. L., & Darnell, R. B. (2013) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.00178 · Cited by 118
Higa, M., Oka, M., Fujihara, Y., Masuda, K., Yoneda, Y., & Kishimoto, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1719921115 · Cited by 61
Rapid UPF1 depletion illuminates the temporal dynamics of the NMD-regulated human transcriptome
Boehm, V., Wallmeroth, D., Wulf, P. O., Popp, O., Teixeira Alves, L. G., Reinecke, L., Riedel, M., Wyler, E., Franitza, M., Becker, K., et al. (2025) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2025.08.015 · Cited by 23
Nemo-like kinase disrupts nuclear import and drives TDP43 mislocalization in ALS
Bekier, M. E., Pinarbasi, E., Krishnan, G., Mesojedec, J. J., Hurley, M., Harikumar Sheela, H., Collins, C. A., Ghaffari, L., de Majo, M., Ullian, E. M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci188138 · Cited by 2
“As an additional control, we interrogated the localization of UPF1, a relatively large cytoplasmic protein (26).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendell, J. T., ap Rhys, C. M. J., & Dietz, H. C.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2002-10-11
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 5592
- Pages
- 419-422
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2084212780
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.