Cited by 789Plant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismPlant Parasitism and Resistance

A PINOID-Dependent Binary Switch in Apical-Basal PIN Polar Targeting Directs Auxin Efflux

Open access
Friml, Jiří, Yang, Xiong, Michniewicz, Marta, Weijers, Dolf, Quint, Ab, Tietz, Olaf, Benjamins, René, Ouwerkerk, Pieter B. F. +5 more·2004·Science

Abstract

Polar transport–dependent local accumulation of auxin provides positional cues for multiple plant patterning processes. This directional auxin flow depends on the polar subcellular localization of the PIN auxin efflux regulators. Overexpression of the PINOID protein kinase induces a basal-to-apical shift in PIN localization, resulting in the loss of auxin gradients and strong defects in embryo and seedling roots. Conversely, pid loss of function induces an apical-to-basal shift in PIN1 polar targeting at the inflorescence apex, accompanied by defective organogenesis. Our results show that a PINOID-dependent binary switch controls PIN polarity and mediates changes in auxin flow to create local gradients for patterning processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1100618

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. R. F. Hoekstra, J. Theor. Biol. 87, 785 (1980).
  2. N. Maire, M. Ackermann, M. Doebeli, Selection 2, 119 (2001).
  3. C. Packer, A. E. Pusey, Sci. Am. 276, 52 (1997).
  4. T. Pitcher, Neth. J. Zool. 42, 371 (1993).
  5. T. H. Clutton-Brock et al., Science 284, 1640 (1999).
  6. J. Friml et al., Nature 426, 147 (2003).
  7. J. Mattsson, W. Ckurshumova, T. Berleth, Plant Physiol. 131, 1327 (2003).
  8. E. Benkova et al., Cell 115, 591 (2003).
  9. J. Friml, K. Palme, Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 273 (2002).
  10. J. Friml, J. Wisniewska, E. Benkova, K. Mendgen, K. Palme, Nature 415, 806 (2002).
  11. N. Geldner et al., Cell 112, 219 (2003).
  12. S. R. M. Bennett, J. Alvarez, G. Bossinger, D. R. Smyth, Plant J. 8, 505 (1995).
  13. S. K. Christensen, N. Dagenais, J. Chory, D. Weigel, Cell 100, 469 (2000).
  14. R. Benjamins, A. Quint, D. Weijers, P. Hooykaas, R. Offringa, Development 128, 4057 (2001).
  15. A. Muller et al., EMBO J. 17, 6903 (1998).
  16. J. Friml et al., Cell 108, 661 (2002).
  17. I. Ottenschlager et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 2987 (2003).
  18. K. Ljung et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 309 (2002).
  19. T. Steinmann et al., Science 286, 316 (1999).
  20. D. Weijers, N. Geldner, R. Offringa, G. Jurgens, Nature 414, 709 (2001).
  21. D. Weijers et al., Development 128, 4289 (2001).
  22. D. Reinhardt et al., Nature 426, 255 (2003).
  23. N. Geldner et al., Development 131, 389 (2004).
  24. T. Berleth, T. Sachs, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4, 57 (2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friml, J., Yang, X., Michniewicz, M., Weijers, D., Quint, A., Tietz, O., Benjamins, R., Ouwerkerk, P. B. F., Ljung, K., Sandberg, G., Hooykaas, P. J. J., Palme, K., & Offringa, R.
Affiliations
  • Developmental Genetics, Center for Molecular Biology of Plants, University Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 3, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Offringa, Remko
Venue
Science
Published
2004-10-29
Volume
306
Issue
5697
Pages
862-865
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2131399365
Cited by
789
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 43
FWCI
50.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
Keywords
PINOID, Pin1, auxin efflux, polar auxin transport, binary switch, auxin gradients, auxin signaling, root development, subcellular localization
MeSH terms
Biological Transport, Indoleacetic Acids, Mutation, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Seeds, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Arabidopsis, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Plant Roots, Meristem, Plant Shoots, Plant Epidermis, Membrane Transport Proteins, Arabidopsis Proteins, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review