CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 424Disaster Management and ResilienceInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisSafety and Risk Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward Inherently Secure and Resilient Societies

Allenby, Brad, Fink, Jonathan·2005·Science
DOI 10.1126/science.1111534
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent years have seen a number of challenges to social stability and order, ranging from terrorist attacks and natural disasters to epidemics such as AIDS and SARS. Such challenges have generated specific policy responses, such as enhanced security at transportation hubs and planned deployment of a global tsunami detection network. However, the range of challenges and the practical impossibility of adequately addressing each in turn argue for adoption of a more comprehensive systems perspective. This should be based on the principle of enhancing social and economic resiliency as well as meeting security and emergency response needs and, to the extent possible, developing and implementing dual-use technologies that offer societal benefits even if anticipated disasters never occur.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1111534

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 8 references

1 of the 8 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. National Research Council Cities Transformed (National Academy Press Washington DC 2003).
  2. R. Zimmerman T. Horan Eds. Digital Infrastructures: Enabling Civil and Environmental Systems Through Information Technology (Routledge London 2004).
  3. M. Amin, in Digital Infrastructures: Enabling Civil and Environmental Systems Through Information Technology, R. Zimmerman, T. Horan, Eds. (Routledge, London, 2004), pages 116–140.
  4. M. Castells The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell Publishers Oxford 2000).
  5. National Research Council Information Technology in the Service Society (National Academy Press Washington DC 1994).
  6. J. Fink, F. Steiner, C. Redman, N. Grimm, in Earth Sciences in the Cities, G. Heiken, R. Fakundiny, J. Sutter, Eds. (American Geophysical Union Special Publication Series 56), pages 413–426.
  7. B. R. Allenby, D. J. Richards, Environ. Qual. Manage.8, 3 (2005).
  8. “Information security: The leaky corporation,” The Economist, 25 June 2005, pp. 57–58.
  9. The Conference Board Voices of Experience: Mature Workers in the Future Workforce (The Conference Board New York 2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Allenby, B., & Fink, J.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Allenby, Brad
ORCID
Fink, Jonathan
Venue
Science
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2005-08-12
Volume
309
Issue
5737
Pages
1034-1036
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
DOI
10.1126/science.1111534
OpenAlex
W2034351791
Cited by
424
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 15
FWCI
43.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Safety and Risk Management
Keywords
social resilience, social stability, security, emergency response, dual-use technology, systems approach, terrorism, natural disasters, epidemics, transport security, tsunami detection, security policy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Cities, Commerce, Disaster Planning, Disasters, Information Services, Information Systems, Public Policy, Security Measures, Social Environment, Sociology, Technology, Transportation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review