The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market
Abstract
Hit songs, books, and movies are many times more successful than average, suggesting that “the best” alternatives are qualitatively different from “the rest”; yet experts routinely fail to predict which products will succeed. We investigated this paradox experimentally, by creating an artificial “music market” in which 14,341 participants downloaded previously unknown songs either with or without knowledge of previous participants' choices. Increasing the strength of social influence increased both inequality and unpredictability of success. Success was also only partly determined by quality: The best songs rarely did poorly, and the worst rarely did well, but any other result was possible.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rosen's economics of superstars [21] shows formally that when the cost of serving additional consumers approaches zero, cultural markets concentrate rewards on a small number of winners regardless of marginal quality differences”
From AI as a Democratizing Force in Indie Game Development (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The market-structure literature of §2.4 predicts what follows: superstar concentration under near-zero marginal cost [21], against which the long-tail alternative [22] is directly testable with the outcome data of Table 13, and choice-abundant markets whose winners are selected by social dynamics rather than quality gradients [23].”
From AI as a Democratizing Force in Indie Game Development (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“When considering inequality in heterogeneous populations, there are two distinct aspects to take into account-the dispersion of outcomes and the predictability of outcomes (Lynn, Podolny, & Tao, 2009;Salganik, Dodds, & Watts, 2006).”
From Relative Feedback Increases Disparities in Effort and Performance in Crowdsourcing Contests: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment on Topcoder (2022) · cites this paper as Salganik, Dodds, & Watts, 2006
In the citing paper
“In the case of an inherent quality or virtue, more predictable outcomes imply more equality and fairness (Cook & Hegtvedt, 1983;Jasso, 1983;Salganik et al., 2006).”
From Relative Feedback Increases Disparities in Effort and Performance in Crowdsourcing Contests: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment on Topcoder (2022) · cites this paper as Salganik et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“However, social success and quality of content are only partly correlated (Salganik et al., 2006).”
From Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media. (2024) · cites this paper as Salganik et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“in a classic experiment, the popularity of all but the very best and worst songs was shown to be more related to stochastic early positive reception by other users than by their inherent quality”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [87]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the presence of a significant number of neutral individuals holding a random opinion and a low confidence level around these two attractive forces tends to increase the unpredictability of the final outcome [15].”
From Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“In agreement with previous works [15], the collective outcome appears to be poorly predictable and strongly dependent on the initial conditions [36].”
From Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Although there is on average a positive relationship between quality and success [66]”
From Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“the ultimate winners in such contests are determined not only by the intrinsic value of the work but also by more intangible social variables [66].”
From Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
Riggins, F. J., & Mitra, S. (1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6637 · Cited by 16,590
Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 · Cited by 6,077
A simple model of global cascades on random networks
Watts, D. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.082090499 · Cited by 2,673
Self-citationA Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D. A., & Welch, I. (1992) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261849 · Cited by 1,980
(1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511663901 · Cited by 1,774
(2009) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1kz4h99.12 · Cited by 1,685
Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task.
Bond, R. A., & Smith, P. B. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111 · Cited by 1,466
Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization-Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems
Hirsch, P. M. (1972) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225192 · Cited by 1,331
Walker, D. M., Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1996) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1061199 · Cited by 1,180
Allison, P. D. (1978) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094626 · Cited by 1,133
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- R. E. Caves Creative Industries (Harvard Univ. Press Cambridge MA 2000).
- S. Rosen, Am. Econ. Rev.71, 845 (1981).
- M. Adler, Am. Econ. Rev.75, 208 (1985).
- L. R. Anderson, C. A. Holt, Am. Econ. Rev.87, 847 (1997).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,401–1,500 of 2,217
Local Social Exposure and Inter-Neighborhood Mobility
de la Prada, À. G. (2021) · Institute for Analytical Sociology dissertation series · doi:10.3384/diss.diva-175573 · Cited by 2
Social Influence Leads to the Formation of Diverse Local Trends
Epstein, Z., Groh, M., Dubey, A., & Pentland, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479553 · Cited by 6
“[54], we find evidence that social influence increases inequality and unpredictability.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLeveraging Semantic Information to Facilitate the Discovery of Underserved Podcasts
Aziz, M., Wang, A., Pappu, A., Bouchard, H., Zhao, Y., Carterette, B., & Lalmas, M. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3481934 · Cited by 3
Seeing Value Through the Eyes of Others: Perceptions of Value and Rebidding in Online Auctions
Sands, D. B. (2022) · Research in the sociology of organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20220000077017 · Cited by 3
Zengin, F. (2022) · Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.52642/susbed.1021531 · Cited by 3
If you move, I move: The social influence effect on residential mobility
de la Prada, À. G., & Tapia, E. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270783 · Cited by 1
Heightened scrutiny: The unequal impact of online hygiene scores on restaurant reviews
Yu, C., & Margolin, D. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221127674 · Cited by 3
“Specifically, previous consumer behaviors including reviews and purchase history influence other people’s consumption decisions and their construction of merchants’ reputation (Salganik et al., 2006).”
The Perniciousness of Higher-Order Evidence on Aesthetic Appreciation
Sackris, D. C., & Larsen, R. R. (2023) · Dialogue · doi:10.1017/s0012217323000070 · Cited by 3
“(Salganik et al., 2006, p. 855) One of the strongest influences on (or predictors of) song success is the observed behaviour of other study participants.”
BackgroundTomarchio, L., He, P., Herthogs, P., & Tunçer, B. (2023) · International Journal on Smart and Sustainable Cities · doi:10.1142/s2972426023400020 · Cited by 3
Early career wins and tournament prestige characterize tennis players’ trajectories
Zappalà, C., Sousa, S., Cunha, T., Pluchino, A., Rapisarda, A., & Sinatra, R. (2024) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00472-3 · Cited by 5
“To mention some examples, paper citations [1–3] and funding [4] in science, start-ups [5], show business [6], art [7] and cryptoart [8, 9] ecosystems, music [10–12], and other creative careers [13, 14], have been investigated to date.”
BackgroundInfluenced by others: Trusting behaviour and social influence
Schütze, T., Nash, K. A., Gehrke, B., et al. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2025.102370 · Cited by 3
Does Social Endorsement Influence Physiological Arousal?
Oh, S. Y., & Kim, S. (2016) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2851581.2892437 · Cited by 3
Methods for Information Diffusion Analysis
Avetisyan, A., Drobyshevskiy, M. D., Турдаков, Д., et al. (2019) · Programming and Computer Software · doi:10.1134/s036176881907003x · Cited by 3
“In [23], having conducted an experimental investigation of an artificial music market, the authors came to the conclusion that no measure of quality can accurately predict the magnitude of information diffusion: it was shown that songs with the same starting conditions can reach rather different levels of popularity.”
BackgroundSarkar, S., Shakarian, P., Sanchez, D. N., Armenta, M., & Lakkaraju, K. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234875 · Cited by 4
“Songs of medium quality were most subject to the effects of social influence [36].”
BackgroundA Simulation Research Towards Better Leverage of Sales Ranking
Tang, L. B., Sun, L., Guo, C., Zuo, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2021) · Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11518-021-5478-4 · Cited by 3
Can Simple Heuristics Explain Moral Inconsistencies?
Fleischhut, N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0017 · Cited by 3
Predictability in an ’Unpredictable’ Artificial Cultural Market
Ormerod, P., & Glass, K. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12079-4_44 · Cited by 3
“In the elegant experiment described in Salganik et al. 2006, researchers constructed an online music market and examined the role social influence played in which songs participants chose to download.”
MethodEvaluating culture: World music and fusion food
Katz, R., & Katz, E. (2014) · International Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367877914554539 · Cited by 3
“Salganik et al. (2006) report that the average life of an American popular song is much shorter, dictated by rapid consensus-formation among fans.”
BackgroundEnvironmental Behavior and Fast and Frugal Heuristics
Artinger, F. M., Bortoleto, A. P., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16793-0_8 · Cited by 4
Hossain, M. A., Chan, C., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45234-0_58 · Cited by 3
“own; (2) perceived social recognition is a fundamental dimension that explains why people share information with their reference groups; there are enormous political contents available over the Internet, but rational people would share the contents after (3) applying truthfulness judgment, and (4) evaluating the overa…”
BackgroundAre Humans Like Ants? -- Analyzing Collective Opinion Formation in Online Discussions
Kaiser, C., Piazza, A., Kröckel, J., & Bodendorf, F. (2011) · International Conference on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/passat/socialcom.2011.94 · Cited by 3
“Based on the knowledge that the behavior of a group does not result from independent actions of individuals ([6], [56]), these models enable simulating how interactions among individuals lead to the emergence of a group-level organization [28].”
BackgroundImproving the Efficiency of Allocating Crowd Donations with Agent-Based Simulation Model
Yen, C., Lee, Y.-C., & Fu, W. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60240-0_30 · Cited by 3
“Consistent with previous research on similar online marketplaces, these results suggest that the collective “voting” by donors may be inefficient in selecting high quality projects [3].”
ResultBig Data, Scarce Attention and Decision-Making Quality
Yu, T., & Chen, S. (2018) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-018-9798-5 · Cited by 3
Directionality of information flow and echoes without chambers
Kim, S. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215949 · Cited by 3
Vedadi, A., & Greer, T. H. (2021) · Information Resources Management Journal · doi:10.4018/irmj.2021010103 · Cited by 4
Predictability and Prediction for an Experimental Cultural Market
Colbaugh, R., Glass, K., & Ormerod, P. (2014) · Cited by 3
Binary choices dynamics with quantum decision
Forno, A. D., Gronchi, G., & Merlone, U. (2021) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2021.102509 · Cited by 3
Guan, L., Zhang, Y., & Zhu, J. J. H. (2021) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-10-2020-0475 · Cited by 3
Individuals, Groups, and Networks: Implications for the Study and Practice of Democratic Politics
Huckfeldt, R. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108878296.035 · Cited by 3
On the matthew effect on individual investments in skills in arts, sports and science
Yegorov, Y., Wirl, F., Graß, D., Eigruber, M., & Feichtinger, G. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.02.008 · Cited by 3
Newman, M. E. J. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198805090.003.0018 · Cited by 3
Jungherr, A. M., & Posegga, O. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-31480-4_54-1 · Cited by 3
Rumors on Social Media During EmergenciesPreprint
Sakamoto, Y., Li, H., & Tanaka, Y. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2473601 · Cited by 3
An Empirical Study of Observational Learning and Product DiscoveryPreprint
Newberry, P. W. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2327814 · Cited by 3
Toward Emerging Topic Detection for Business Intelligence: Predictive Analysis of `Meme' DynamicsPreprint
Glass, K., & Colbaugh, R. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1012.5994 · Cited by 3
“…individuals and organizations become aware of memes and judge their appeal in part by observing others, and as a consequence successful memes may attract attention not because they are particularly interesting but instead simply because they’ve attracted attention in the past [e.g., 12,14].”
BackgroundResultEffects of Social Influence in Peer Online Recommendation.Preprint
Hogg, T., & Lerman, K. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
Audience Structure and Status MultiplicityPreprint
Kovács, B., & Liu, C. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2646683 · Cited by 3
The effects of network topology on strategic behavior
Kearns, M. J., & Suri, S. (2007) · Cited by 3
Do Online Social Networks Increase Welfare?Preprint
Mueller-Frank, M., & Pai, M. M. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2517497 · Cited by 3
“Second, what are the welfare effects relative to 1For example due to inefficient herding: see Banerjee (1992) and Bikhchandani, Hirshleifer, and Welch (1992) for the underlying theory, and Salganik, Dodds, and Watts (2006) for experimental evidence.”
BackgroundUnderstanding Social Media Credibility
Mitra, T. (2017) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) · Cited by 3
Lazer, D. M. J. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0679 · Cited by 3
Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Li, Y. (2015) · The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society · doi:10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs093 · Cited by 3
The wisdom of the few: Predicting collective success from individual behaviorPreprint
Mariani, M. S., Gimenez, Y., Brea, J., Minnoni, M., Algesheimer, R., & Tessone, C. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.04777 · Cited by 2
“…success stories (either their own or thirdparty ones), yet in social environments, success predictions are made difficult by social feedback mechanisms and serendipity (Salganik et al. 2006, Van de Rijt et al. 2014), and only a handful of products and services end up becoming highly-successful.”
BackgroundManipulating the Online Marketplace of IdeasPreprint
Lou, X., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
pBOL: An Idea Filtering Method Based on Negative Multi-Voting and Pareto AggregationPreprint
García, A. C. B., & Klein, M. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3175329 · Cited by 3
Tolerance for failure unleashes the benefits of cognitive diversity in collective problem solvingPreprint
Sulik, J., Bahrami, B., & Deroy, O. D. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3es76 · Cited by 2
T-RECS: A Simulation Tool to Study the Societal Impact of Recommender SystemsPreprint
Lucherini, E., Sun, M. D., Winecoff, A., & Narayanan, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.08959 · Cited by 11
“Recommender systems may exhibit a bias toward popular items, resulting in homogenization of user behavior and a concentration of the market for content in the hands of a small number of creators [14, 16, 66].”
BackgroundGuilbeault, D., van Loon, A., Lix, K., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/vyrxz · Cited by 3
Scaling up experimental social, behavioral, and economic sciencePreprint
Almaatouq, A., Becker, J. A., Bernstein, M. S., Botto, R., Bradlow, E. T., Damer, E., Duckworth, A. L., Griffiths, T. L., Hartshorne, J. K., Law, E., et al. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/wksv8 · Cited by 2
Self-citationAn Anatomy of Algorithm AversionPreprint
Sunstein, C. R., & Gaffe, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4865492 · Cited by 3
Adoption as a Social Marker: The Diffusion of Products in a Multigroup Environment.Preprint
Smaldino, P. E., Janssen, M. A., Hillis, V., & Bednar, J. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
Corbo, L., Corrado, R., & Odorici, V. (2022) · Research in the sociology of organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20220000077019 · Cited by 2
Thomas, A., Archer, A., & Engelen, B. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197781722.001.0001 · Cited by 3
Reinforcement generates systematic differences without heterogeneity
Gelastopoulos, A., Sage, L., & van de Rijt, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2408163122 · Cited by 2
The Impact of Learning Mode and Speed on Mutual Learning
Denrell, J. C., Christensen, M., Knudsen, T., & Liu, C. (2025) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2023.0173 · Cited by 3
Estimating Position and Social Influence Effects in Online Search
Osgouei, A. J., Ching, A. T., Ratchford, B. T., & Tehrani, S. S. (2025) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2023.0392 · Cited by 6
Kasaras, K., Klimis, G. M., & Michailidou, M. (2025) · Collective Intelligence · doi:10.1177/26339137251387144 · Cited by 2
“The outcomes of this experiment con fi rmed the fi ndings of Salganik et al. (2006, 2008, 2009), that collective social dynamics decisively shape decision-making in the consumption of music and contradict the results of the research made by Steininger and Gatzemeier (2013).”
InfluentialSans, F. M., Afungchui, D., Vubangsi, M., et al. (2025) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117650 · Cited by 2
Zhang, H., Wang, H., Mehra, A., & Zheng, Z. (2026) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03573 · Cited by 8
Shim, H., & Kim, D. (2026) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.104806 · Cited by 3
Precision Chemistry for Protein Lysine Modification
Onoda, M., & Kanai, M. (2026) · Chemistry - A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.71193 · Cited by 2
Kim, H. S. (2014) · Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 2
Social Mechanics: An Empirically Grounded Science of Social Media
Lerman, K., Galstyan, A., Steeg, G. V., & Hogg, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v5i4.14087 · Cited by 2
“Experiments, especially with multiple randomly-selected groups (Salganik, Dodds, and Watts 2006), are a more powerful approach, but they are seldom practical in the social media domain.”
MethodConjugate distribution laws in cultural evolution via statistical learning
Nakamura, E. (2021) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.104.034309 · Cited by 2
Fischer, C. S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108878296.017 · Cited by 3
Weingartner, S., Schenk, P., & Rössel, J. (2021) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1177/07311214211057120 · Cited by 5
“…a specific quality inherent to certain cultural objects but is ascribed to them in a process of social construction, which is also true for the ascription of cultural value in general (Bourdieu 1996b; Carroll 2015; Kovács 2019; Lehman et al. 2019; Peterson 2005; Salganik, Dodds, and Watts 2006).”
BackgroundMeasuring collective attention in online content
Wu, S. (2022) · ACM SIGWEB Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3545196.3545200 · Cited by 2
“Motivated by the MusicLab experiments [Salganik et al. 2006; Krumme et al. 2012], I take an item-centric approach and conceptualize online user behaviors as two steps – the first step is based on the content appeal, measured by the number of clicks or views; the second step is based on the content quality, measured by…”
MethodBaten, R. A., Aslin, R. Ν., Ghoshal, G., et al. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac255 · Cited by 2
“Popularity signals have previously been reported to socially influence cultural, economic, and academic networks (16–18).”
Reflections on Cass Sunstein’s Beatlemania article: romantic behaviouralism?
Duffett, M. (2023) · The Journal of Beatles Studies · doi:10.3828/jbs.2023.3 · Cited by 2
A hypernetwork-based urn model for explaining collective dynamics
Lu, J., Du, H., & He, X. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291778 · Cited by 2
“, accessing the products’ popularity information as the criterion for their choices [16].”
BackgroundA Song Classifier for Predicting User Preference Based on Spotify Song Attributes
Boon, Y. Y., Lim, S. M., Choong, A. Y. Y., et al. (2023) · International Conference on Information Technology in Asia (CITA) · doi:10.1109/cita58204.2023.10262684 · Cited by 2
“For instance, [2] concluded that social influence significantly determines a song's popularity and quality.”
BackgroundAziz, M., Anderton, J., Jamieson, K., Wang, A., Bouchard, H., & Aslam, J. A. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3626324 · Cited by 2
“The seminal “MusicLab” experiment of Salganik et al. [ 39 ] indicates that knowing a song’s down-load count influences a user’s decision to listen to it, even when that download count is falsified.”
InfluentialMirsadikov, A., Vedadi, A., & Marett, K. (2024) · Information and Computer Security · doi:10.1108/ics-06-2023-0103 · Cited by 2
Meta-Dominance Analysis – A Tool for the Assessment of the Quality of Digital Behavioural Data
Schneck, A., & Przepiorka, W. (2024) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393241261958 · Cited by 2
“The properties of DBD are determined by the design of existing online platforms before the empirical part of the research process starts (although see Salganik et al., 2006).”
Contextual Bandit with Herding Effects: Algorithms and Recommendation Applications
Xu, L., Wang, L., Xie, H. L., et al. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-0128-8_12 · Cited by 2
Exploiting multiple influence pattern of event organizer for event recommendation
Han, X., Meng, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103966 · Cited by 2
Studying factual versus social cues as triggers of change in food behaviour
Zorell, C. V., Kim, A., & Neuman, N. (2024) · Journal of Nutritional Science · doi:10.1017/jns.2024.82 · Cited by 2
“Examples include consumer goods such as music streaming, (15) energy consumption, (16) towel use in hotels, (17) and voter turnout.”
In the Company of Strangers: Social Influence from Anonymous Peers in Online Game Settings
Jo, W., Sunder, S., Choi, J., & Trivedi, M. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucae075 · Cited by 2
The few-get-richer: a surprising consequence of popularity-based rankings
Germano, F., Gómez, V., & Mens, G. L. (2019) · RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.02580 · Cited by 2
Odnos glazbenih preferencija srednjoškolaca, glazbenog obrazovanja i sociodemografskih varijabli
Škojo, T. (2020) · Metodički ogledi · doi:10.21464/mo.26.2.5 · Cited by 2
Yang, C. H., Shi, C., Liu, Z., 涂存超, & Sun, M. (2021) · Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning · doi:10.2200/s01063ed1v01y202012aim048 · Cited by 5
Reconstructing Online Behaviors by Effort Minimization
Rad, A. A., & Rahmandad, H. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_9 · Cited by 2
The Game Has Changed: A New Paradigm for Stakeholder Engagement
McEuen, M. B. (2011) · Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel Administration (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Wissenschaftliche Aspekte der Datenqualität
Stegbauer, C. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-05327-7_3 · Cited by 2
“Ein Problem dabei ist die Reaktivität solcher Daten, bei denen Einflüsse von sozialer Erwünschtheit, der Interviewsituation etc. eine Rolle spielen.”
BackgroundDas aktive Publikum – Eine Ortsbestimmung
Jäckel, M., & Fröhlich, G. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-93336-8_6 · Cited by 2
Stochastic Models of Large-Scale Human Behavior on the Web
Lerman, K., & Hogg, T. (2009) · Cited by 2
Keuschnigg, M. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-01164-2_32 · Cited by 3
Superstars versus Celebrities — Big Man or Big Name?
Franck, E. P., & Nüesch, S. (2008) · Gabler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-8350-5429-5_5 · Cited by 2
“Hamlen (1991, 1994) or Salganik, Dodds, and Watts (2006) fail to find empirical evidence for Rosen’s superstar explanation in the popular music industry.”
BackgroundA MASS PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE ON FINANCIAL MARKETS
Fenzl, T., Brudermann, T., Malik, C., et al. (2013) · Cited by 2
Bryson, A., Rossi, G., & Simmons, R. (2012) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 2
Forum: stigma, discrimination and health: policies and research challenges. Postscript
Bastos, F. I. (2012) · Cadernos de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/s0102-311x2012000100021 · Cited by 2
Evolutionary Approaches to Privatisation
Ormerod, P. (2014) · Economic Affairs · doi:10.1111/ecaf.12067 · Cited by 2
Sukumaran, A., & Nass, C. (2010) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/1753846.1753988 · Cited by 2
“Making public the preferences of other users can be a powerful source of social influence, creating greater divergence and unpredictability in eventual user preferences [14].”
BackgroundAn incentive-based architecture for social recommendations
Bhattacharjee, R., Goel, A., & Kollias, K. (2009) · ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) · doi:10.1145/1639714.1639755 · Cited by 2
“It has been experimentally observed [7] that in systems where individual decisions are influenced by the decisions of others, quality alone doesn’t determine the success of an item.”
BackgroundCordasco, G., Riviello, M. T., Capuano, V., et al. (2013) · IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications · doi:10.1109/coginfocom.2013.6719275 · Cited by 2
Planck, M., Pollard, I. L., Brock, C., et al. (2013) · doi:10.1109/nsw.2013.6609214 · Cited by 2
Dürer, A. (2010) · Cited by 2
WHY AMAZON'S RATINGS MIGHT MISLEAD YOU
Wang, T., & Wang, D. (2014) · Cited by 2
The Impact of Collective Opinion on Online Judgment
Sakamoto, Y. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 6
Internet comments as a barometer of public opinion
Oster, E., Gilad, E., & Feigel, A. (2015) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/111/28005 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Santa Fe Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Salganik, Matthew J.
- Dodds, Peter Sheridan
- Watts, Duncan J.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2006-02-10
- Volume
- 311
- Issue
- 5762
- Pages
- 854-856
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2147453867
- Cited by
- 2,231
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 168 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 231 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 131 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 121 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 133 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 122
- FWCI
- 116.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- cultural market, social influence, music download, product success, consumer choice
- MeSH terms
- Consumer Behavior, Culture, Forecasting, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Music, Research Design, Social Behavior, Sociology, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
