The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Merits of Training Mentors
Abstract
I n research universities and colleges, mentoring is one of the most important skills for faculty because it affects both research productivity and the quality of training for undergraduate students, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers. Moreover, the diversity of science is dependent on the quality of mentored research, because this experience is a key to attracting underrepresented groups to science (1–5). In the past, many faculty learned skills such as mentoring on the job. In recent years, various organizations have developed training programs to help prospective and new faculty learn skills such as grant writing, laboratory management, and classroom teaching, but mentoring has been largely absent. In response to this need, we developed and evaluated a mentor-training seminar. The seminar is intended to improve mentors’ skills and to enhance the research experiences of undergraduate students. In research universities, graduate students and postdoctoral researchers often serve as the primary mentors for undergraduate researchers (see photograph, this page). This arrangement provides undergraduates with guidance from a person who is accessible and whose primary focus is laboratory work. It also provides graduate students and postdoctoral researchers with experience as mentors. Therefore, our seminar focused on training graduate students and postdoctoral researchers as mentors, but it is also suitable for developing mentoring skills of faculty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Undergraduate Student-Faculty Research Partnerships Affect Studen Retention
Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., von Hippel, W., & Lerner, J. S. (1998) · The Review of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/rhe.1998.0016 · Cited by 724
Cited by
Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning
Lopatto, D. (2007) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039 · Cited by 1,009
Hernandez, P. R., Schultz, P. W., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Chance, R. C. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029691 · Cited by 337
Tuma, T. T., Adams, J. D., Hultquist, B. C., & Dolan, E. L. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-10-0231 · Cited by 118
Griffin, K. A., Baker, V. L., & O’Meara, K. (2020) · Knowledge Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33350-8_13 · Cited by 50
Framework for advancing rigorous research
Koroshetz, W. J., Behrman, S., Brame, C. J., Branchaw, J. L., Brown, E. N., Clark, E. A., Dockterman, D., Elm, J. J., Gay, P. L., Green, K. M., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.55915 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfund, C., Maidl Pribbenow, C., Branchaw, J., Miller Lauffer, S., & Handelsman, J.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2006-01-27
- Volume
- 311
- Issue
- 5760
- Pages
- 473-474
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2103176682
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Merits of Training Mentors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1123806
- The paper
- Pfund, C., Maidl Pribbenow, C., Branchaw, J., Miller Lauffer, S., & Handelsman, J. (2006). The Merits of Training Mentors. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.